Jump to content

Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration

Extended-protected article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

During the second presidency of Donald Trump, the United States government has taken a series of actions to persecute people who are transgender. These actions have been accompanied by anti-transgender rhetoric and misinformation, often to dehumanize and scapegoat transgender people and portray them as a social threat.

The administration has restricted, defunded, and blocked gender-affirming care—especially in the case of minors—as well as research and education related to transgender issues. It has utilized censorship of inclusive language for the purpose of anti-transgender policy and directed law enforcement and the FBI to investigate the promotion of "radical gender ideology". The Trump administration has undergone purges of transgender military personnel, prohibited transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports, discriminated against transgender inmates, and has created restrictions on passports and international travel for transgender people.

The Trump administration's actions targeting transgender people draw much of their design from the anti-transgender movement in the United Kingdom, and form part of the broader 2020s anti-LGBTQ movement in the United States and the anti-gender movement. The administration's actions have been referred to by some advocates as the early stages of genocide similar to that of persecution of transgender people in Nazi Germany, arguing they seek to "marginalize them socially and economically".[1]

Background

In the years leading up to the 2024 United States presidential election, there were an increasing number of state level laws and bans targeting transgender people.[2][3][4] Anti-transgender campaigning was a large part of the Trump campaign,[5][6] with spending on anti-transgender advertising being greater than spending on advertising discussing housing, immigration, or the economy.[7] At multiple times throughout the campaign, Trump made false claims that schools were performing "gender-affirming surgeries on children without their parents' consent", with multiple conservative groups stating that, while not true, the claims were "valid".[8][9] Trump promised during his campaign that, if elected, he would sign an executive order instructing every federal agency to cease the promotion of sex or gender transition at any age, and promised to crack down on gender-affirming care for all ages.[10][11]

Project 2025, which was published in 2023, detailed many of the goals of policies targeting transgender people that have since been implemented during the second Trump presidency.[12][13][14] The administration's actions targeting transgender people have also drawn from the actions of the anti-transgender movement in the United Kingdom over the 2010s and 2020s.[15][16]

Executive orders

Following his second inauguration on January 20, 2025, Trump began issuing a series of executive orders targeting transgender people across the United States.[17][18]

Executive Order 14168

On January 20, 2025, shortly after being inaugurated, Trump signed an Executive Order,[19][20] which defined sex to the federal government as a male-female binary, with "female" and "male" defined as "a person belonging, at conception to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell" and a "person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell", respectively.[19][21] The order also mandated that:

  • Federal agencies use "sex" instead of "gender", remove materials that "promote gender ideology", and halt "funding of gender ideology"[19]:§ 3(a), 3(e)[22][23]
  • Official government documents such as passports and visas prohibit self-selection of gender[19]:§ 3(d)[24][25]
  • Transgender people be barred from government-funded single-sex facilities congruent with their gender identity[19]:§ 4
  • The Bureau of Prisons halt federal funding for gender-affirming care.[19]:§ 4(c)[22]
  • Federal funding no longer be used for gender-affirming care[26][25]
  • The attorney general provide guidance to "correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions" in federal agency activities[19]:§ 3(f)
  • Prior policies and federal documents inconsistent with itself be rescinded, including policies requiring the use of names and pronouns consistent with a person's gender identity in federal workplaces.[27]

Trump defended the order by stating it would protect women from "men masquerading as women".[28]

Provisions of the order have faced legal challenges, with temporary restraining orders having been issued to suspend the withholding of federal funding to programs that fund gender-affirming care and promote "gender ideology",[29] the forced transfers of transgender inmates to facilities congruent with their sex assigned at birth,[30] and the mass removal of documents published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Health and Human Services that mention topics related to "gender ideology".[31][32][33]

In July 2025, the federal government shut down specialized services for LGBTQ youth through its Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, stating that such services encouraged children to "to embrace radical gender ideology".[25]

In July 2025, The Lancet published an investigation which alleged that around half of all U.S. health datasets were secretly and substantially altered in the two months after the executive order was signed, with the alterations being done to remove messages that "promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology".[34][35]

In October 2025, the Trump administration blocked student loan forgiveness for any public worker or group who takes part in providing gender-affirming care to transgender youth.[36]

In November 2025, after the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that gender markers in passports could be restricted,[37] the State Department introduced a policy to comply with the executive order that required passports issued to transgender people to mark the gender initially recorded on their birth certificates,[38] superseding the prior policy that had been in place since 1992.[39]

Word blacklisting

In January 2025, a list of "forbidden terms" was reportedly distributed within the government's health-related agencies, instructing employees to avoid certain words, including "gender", "transgender", or "LGBT".[40][27][41] Such words were also widely removed from websites run by multiple different federal agencies,[22] including the National Park Service Stonewall National Monument website.[42][43] Editors at scientific journals, such as The BMJ and the European Journal of Public Health, objected to the policy.[44][45][46] Scientific grants were revoked or reviewed on the basis of that LGBT topics had been mentioned in the research.[47][48][44]

Executive Order 14183

On January 27, 2025, Trump signed an executive order declaring that a soldier being transgender "conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life" and that transgender people "cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service".[49][50]

On March 18, 2025, Judge Ana C. Reyes blocked the executive order, ruling that banning transgender people from the military likely violated their constitutional rights.[51]

A May 15 memo later detailed how transgender service members would be discharged, saying that they would be given the discharge code of "JDK", which is typically used to indicate that a soldier is considered a threat to national security, and which can prevent them from getting future jobs or security clearances.[52] An August 4 United States Air Force memo announced that long-serving transgender members normally eligible for retirement benefits would be denied them.[53] A memo sent out at the beginning of October advised that unit commanders could override the decisions of separation boards if the separation boards determined that transgender service personnel could remain in service.[54][55][56]

Executive Order 14187

New York-Presbyterian Hospital canceled some appointments for gender-affirming care in response to Executive Order 14187.[57]

On January 28, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to "Protect Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation".[58] The order described gender-affirming care for minors as "chemical and surgical mutilation of children" as well as "maiming" and "sterilizing".[59][60] It stated "countless children" who received such care would regret a "horrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children through breastfeeding".[61] The order also described the World Professional Association for Transgender Health's (WPATH) guidance as "junk science".[61][59]

The order states that the U.S. Federal Government will not "fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another".[61][62] The provisions include:

NBC News described the language in the executive order as inflammatory and noted that major medical associations support access to transgender health care for minors.[64]

In response, some hospitals paused providing gender-affirming care for minors, while others continued.[65][66] Some hospitals cancelled care for even those older than 19.[67][68] Attorney generals from 15 states said their states are committed to continuing to provide gender-affirming care to minors. Multiple groups filed lawsuits challenging the legality of the executive order. In response to one of the lawsuits, several federal judges issued injunctions blocking the government from withholding federal funds from hospitals that provide gender affirming care to minors.[69][33] Following the injunction, some hospitals that initially paused gender-affirming care for minors resumed the care.[70][71]

In the summer of 2025, the Department of Justice began sending subpoenas to "over 20" hospitals demanding the full records of patients who received medical care under 19 – including their names, social security numbers, doctors' notes, and treatments prescribed.[72][73] This practice continued into 2026, expanding to many more hospitals across the nation.[74][75][76]

On October 30, 2025, NPR reported on proposed rules from the Department of Health and Human Services that would prohibit federal Medicaid reimbursement for medical care provided to transgender patients under 18, and block Medicaid and Medicare funding for any services at hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to children. NPR also highlighted that at the time of writing gender-affirming care for children was already banned in 27 states.[77]

The executive order is similar to a portion of Project 2025 that called for withdrawing "guidance issued under the Biden Administration concerning sexual orientation and gender identity under Section 1557" of the Affordable Care Act.[78][79]

Detransition centers

In 2026, the Trump admin began forcing hospitals which it had found to have acted in violation of the order — beginning with Texas Children's Hospital and The Cleveland Clinic — to establish detransition clinics, which would perform medical detransitions on any patient who had previously received transgender healthcare.[80][81][82]

Executive Order 14190

On January 29, 2025, Trump signed an executive order "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling".[83] Under the order, law enforcement are directed to conduct investigations of educational or education-related institutions suspected of involvement in the "instruction, advancement, or promotion of gender ideology" declaring such ideas to be anti-American and subversive.[84]

The order further directs law enforcement to criminally prosecute any teacher who "unlawfully facilitates" the social transition of a transgender minor. Listed examples of unlawful facilitation include psychiatric counseling by a school counselor, referring to the student using their preferred name and/or pronouns, referring to a student as "non-binary", and allowing the student to use segregated facilities or participate on segregated sports teams differing from those of their assigned sex. The order directs that educators in violation of this law be prosecuted as having committed sexual exploitation of a minor, and/or practicing medicine without a license.[85][86][87] Additionally, schools found in violation would have their federal funding revoked.[88]

In August 2025 the Trump administration threatened to pull federal funding from sex education programs that mention transgender people, whom it referred to as "gender ideology."[89] By November 2025, 11 states and 2 territories had complied with the threat.[90]

Executive Order 14201

On February 5, 2025, Trump signed an executive order titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports", which directs federal agencies and state attorneys general to immediately enforce a prohibition of transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports.[91][92][62] The order does not ban transgender men athletes from playing on male sports teams.[93] As part of this order's implementation, the Department of Education urged high school and college athletics organizations NCAA and NFHS to revoke transgender female athletes' records and restore cisgender athletes' records.[93][94] The State Department also announced a ban on transgender athletes from entering the United States if they attempt to compete in women's sports, and said that visa applicants suspected of such would have their file marked with the letters 'SWS25' for the purposes of tracking. Visa applicants for any purpose who list a gender other than their assigned sex on their visa application will be permanently banned from entering the United States on grounds of "fraud".[95] Later Trump threatened to impose fines on California due to a transgender athlete competing in the 2025 California high school track and field championship,[28] coinciding with a lawsuit filed by the federal government against California for allowing transgender athletes to compete in the gender categories that do not match their assigned sex at birth.[25]

Rescinding former orders

On January 20, 2025, Trump rescinded Executive Order 13988.[96] The executive order had sought to protect LGBTQ rights in federal prisons and prevent discrimination.[97][98]

Law enforcement

Pam Bondi with Donald Trump in the Oval Office, April 2025

FBI targeting

In December 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi instructed the FBI to begin offering cash bounties for information leading to the identification and arrest of transgender activists promoting what she referred to as "radical gender ideology", and described such activists as "domestic terrorist groups".[99][100]

In May 2026, The White House published its "United States Counterterrorism Strategy" which said that "In addition to cartels and Islamist terror groups, our national CT activities will also prioritize the rapid identification and neutralization of violent secular political groups whose ideology is anti-American, radically pro-transgender, and anarchist."[101]

Prisons

Federal prison

From 2025, the Federal Bureau of Prisons stopped reporting on the number of transgender prisoners held.[24] Beginning in 2026, the Federal Bureau of Prisons adopted new policies based on policies in Florida that mandated conversion therapy for transgender inmates. Under the federal policy, transgender inmates would have their hair cut short, be taken off hormone medication, and instead be put into psychiatric therapy and given psychiatric drugs.[102][103] Imprisoned transgender individuals reported that they were being denied access to care.[104][105]

ICE detention

Transgender men in ICE custody under the Trump administration have reportedly been specifically subjected to forced labor programs, with justifications given by guards including "If you wanna be a man, I'll treat you like a man" and "Aren't you strong enough? Aren't you a man?". Those who refused faced punishments including beatings and solitary confinement, with many also reporting severe sexual abuse.[106] Transgender inmates are also routinely denied access to medical care, both gender related and non-gender related, leading regular illnesses in transgender detainees to go untreated due to doctors' refusal.[107][108] Data is hard to come by, however, as starting in 2025, ICE stopped complying with a federal law which required them to report data on transgender people in their custody.[109]

Removal of protections against sexual violence in prison

Under Trump, the Department of Justice has issued instruction to inspectors to stop evaluating prisons and jails using standards designed to protect transgender and intersex people from sexual assault.[110][111][112] According to data from the 2015 US transgender survey, transgender, intersex and gender-nonconforming people are uniquely vulnerable to such violence.[113]

The rule change did not follow the usual process, but was done through a memo which instructs PREA inspectors to mark trans-related standards as 'not applicable'. Executive director of Just Detention International, Linda McFarlane, stated that this "will immediately put people in danger."[114][111] Deputy director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Tammie Gregg, said that the policy was to align practices in prisons with Executive Order 14168.[111]

Proposed ban on keeping firearms

On September 4, 2025, multiple news organizations reported that the Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi was looking into ways to limit transgender individuals' right to keep and bear arms.[115][116] The discussions came in the aftermath of the Annunciation Catholic Church shooting, which, according to the Associated Press (AP), was perpetrated by a transgender person.[117] The potential limitations drew condemnation from both LGBTQ rights groups as well as gun rights advocacy groups, such as the Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association (NRA), with the latter groups opposing blanket gun bans.[117] The NRA said, "the NRA supports the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans to purchase, possess and use firearms. NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process".[118][119] Per the AP, "LGBTQ advocates called it misguided and dangerous as the vast majority of mass shootings in the U.S. are carried out by men and do not involve transgender people".[117]

Reporting

In the annual National Crime Victimization Survey run by the Department of Justice removed any questions relating to gender identity and hate crimes based on transgender status.[22][120]

Federal level actions

On January 28, 2025, Trump ordered a freeze on all federal funding grants, loans, and aid while those receiving them were assessed to make sure they were not promoting "Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies".[121][122] Multiple organizations subsequently challenged their grant and funding freezes, with nine groups having funding partially restored by July 2025.[25] In April 2025, after the Maine Department of Corrections refused to move a transgender inmate to an opposite gender prison, Pam Bondi claimed on Fox & Friends that $1.5 million in federal funding was being withheld from the Maine Department of Corrections in response.[123][124]

Legal writers for Slate and the Washington University Law Review have argued that the second Trump administration's policies restrain transgender people's right to vote, or constitute voter disenfranchisement, citing the combination of the U.S. Department of State's 2025 restrictions for transgender people's passports, and the proposed requirement that certain identity documents (which require a gender marker and could include a passport) be presented in order to vote.[125][126] Other legal writers have previously highlighted the impact that such state level laws have had on transgender voter disenfranchisement.[127][128]

Actions to ban gender-affirming care

Congress

On December 17, 2025, the House of Representatives voted to pass H.R. 3492, the Protect Children's Innocence Act, a bill sponsored by Marjorie Taylor Greene that would criminalize parents, children, and doctors providing gender-affirming care to transgender youth.[129] The House passage of the bill was condemned by the American Civil Liberties Union.[130]

Executive branch

Department of Health and Human Services Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill discussed the department's views on transgender people at the December 18, 2025 news conference.
Department of Health and Human Services Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill discussed the department's views on transgender people at the December 18, 2025 news conference.[131][132][133]

The administration restricted access to gender-affirming care.[134]

On December 18, 2025, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. issued a declaration, effective immediately, that prohibited Medicare and Medicaid funding from being issued for any purpose to hospitals that offer gender-affirming care to minors.[135] The declaration referred to gender-affirming care as "sex-rejecting procedures" that were "neither safe nor effective as a treatment modality for gender dysphoria, gender incongruence, or other related disorders in minors".[136][137] At the news conference, Health and Human Services Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill affirmed the department's stance on two sexes and that people can not transition, stating that "at the root of the evils we face, is a hatred for nature as God designed it and for life as it was meant to be lived."[131] The declaration was criticized by politicians, health officials, and LGBTQ rights activists.[136][137]

A lawsuit was filed by Oregon and 21 other states seeking to vacate the declaration, arguing that it circumvented standard rulemaking procedures.[138] In April 2026, Oregon district judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai vacated the declaration, ruling that the Department of Health and Human Services exceeded its authority by attempting to unilaterally establish standards of care, violated the Administrative Procedure Act by circumventing the required notice and comment process, and violated Medicare statutes prohibiting federal officials from exercising "supervision or control over the practice of medicine or the manner in which medical services are provided."[139][140]

In May 2026, federal judge James Boasberg issued a preliminary injunction blocking a probe by the Federal Trade Commission into the Endocrine Society and WPATH, ruling that they were unconstitutional and based on politically-motivated animus.[141]

State-level actions

Several Republican-run states have followed the lead of the Trump administration on transgender issues, enacting legislation to limit access to healthcare, government services, and public life for transgender people.[142][143]

As of 2025, more than half of U.S. states—mostly Republican-led states—had enacted state level bans on gender-affirming care for minors. In June 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Skrmetti that Tennessee's ban discriminated on age and medical use. While discrimination on the basis of sex is subject to heightened intermediate scrutiny, discriminating on age and medical use is subject to rational basis review, which the court ruled Tennessee's law satisfied.[144][145][146][147] On March 10, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in Anderson v. Crouch that West Virginia may prohibit gender-affirming procedures for adults from being covered by Medicaid, arguing that the law applied to procedures and not individuals, and that it was "not irrational for a legislature to encourage citizens to appreciate their sex".[148][149]

In February 2025, Alabama and several other states introduced legislation to define gender to be congruent with sex assigned at birth, following on from Trump's executive order declaring the same.[150]

In August 2025, the Texas State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 8 (SB8), a bathroom bill that would restrict transgender people's access to public bathrooms that match their gender. Under the bill, facilities could be fined up to $125,000 per offense, as well as authorizing private citizens reports.[151]

Also in August 2025, Alaskan republican Matt Heilala introduced a draft to the Alaska State Medical Board that would discipline any medical providers in the states that are providing gender-affirming care for youth. The board unanimously approved the proposal on August 22, 2025 without public input on the proposal. Heilala announced his immediate resignation following the conclusion of the meeting, and announced his plan to run for Governor of Alaska at the next election. In response, Tom Pittman, executive director of Anchorage-based advocacy and health care organization Identity Inc, said that "nearly 700 Alaska medical professionals have signed an open letter opposing the changes being considered by the board."[152]

In September 2025, Republican representative Josh Schriver introduced House Bill 4938 in Michigan.[153] The "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act" seeks to ban pornography, virtual private networks, and depictions of transgender people online.[154][155]

In early 2026 bills were also introduced or progressed that targeted transgender people in the state legislatures of Idaho, Oklahoma, and Utah.[21]

In February 2026, Kansas passed a bill that contained both a bathroom ban with a private right of action for publicly-funded facilities and a ban on gender self-identification on state-issued identity documents such as driver's licenses.[156][157][133] Many people who were flagged as potentially transgender in the government system were informed on February 25 that their ID and driver's licenses would become invalid the next day, without any grace period, so even driving to the Division of Vehicles office to apply for a new license could result in a $1,000 fine and 6 months in jail.[158]

Dehumanization, scapegoating and misinformation

Trump has repeatedly characterized transgender people as a societal menace, a corrupt elite, and a threat to children.[159] Scholars and extremism experts have warned that the Trump administration's sustained targeting of transgender people—a group comprising less than 1% of the U.S. population—resembles authoritarian strategies that single out a vulnerable minority in order to consolidate power. Analysts have pointed to historical parallels, such as the Nazi destruction of the Institute for Sexual Research in 1933, where attacks on a visible queer institution were used to galvanize support for broader repression.[160]

Civil rights groups also argue that the Trump administration's language opens the door to wider censorship and repression, noting that book bans and curriculum restrictions have increasingly targeted works on gender, sexuality, and racial justice under the banner of fighting "gender ideology."[160] Idit Klein of Keshet, in response to Trump sharing an image of a pink triangle crossed out, said that such actions are "frighteningly reminiscent for both LGBTQ+ people and Jews of our long histories of persecution, which have included tactics we're seeing today, such as scapegoating, book bans, destruction of information access, and control/confiscation of identity documents like passports".[161]

Transgender health care

In 2024, Trump claimed that children were being given gender-affirming surgery at school, repeating it multiple times throughout his campaign, despite there being no evidence that any school in the United States had ever provided gender-affirming surgery to a student.[162][163][9] Trump repeated such claims in his 2026 State of the Union Address.[164][165]

The New York Times has noted that Trump's directives and speeches regularly use terms such as "maiming" or "junk science" to describe gender-affirming care and the research that supports it.[166] The New York Times themselves have often run misinformation pieces on transgender healthcare which,[167][168][169] according to a former journalist there, was part of a project to win favor with the Trump administration,[170][171] with pieces by The New York Times being cited in Republican legislative and judicial filings to justify restrictions and rollbacks of transgender rights.[172] Trump has called being transgender "lunacy" and "insanity," insisted in speeches that "there are only two genders, male and female," and ridiculed transgender athletes at campaign rallies to cheers from his supporters.[173] Fact-checks of his 2025 State of the Union address noted that Trump falsely claimed taxpayer dollars were spent on "making mice transgender," mischaracterizing NIH-funded medical research into hormone therapy and HIV treatment.[174]

Violence by transgender people

Donald Trump Jr. and Charlie Kirk have both spread misinformation about violence by transgender people.[175]

NPR and other outlets have documented a broader pattern in which Trump and allied Republicans seize on mass shootings and other tragedies to falsely identify perpetrators as transgender, part of a political strategy to scapegoat a small minority group. Experts on extremism and disinformation have warned that such rhetoric deliberately fosters fear and division, echoing earlier authoritarian tactics to rally support by vilifying minorities.[160] Claims that the shooter was transgender happen "almost every time there is a school shooting in America", according to USA Today.[176] Michael Jensen, research director at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, was quoted as saying, "I'm aware of no evidence to support the claim that transgender people are disproportionately responsible for mass violence events in the U.S., including shootings in schools. In fact, the data suggests quite the opposite."[176]

Throughout the 2020s, false accusations have been spread by individuals associated with the MAGA movement that transgender people commit acts of violence at a higher rate than cisgender people.[177] In 2025, conservative commentator Matt Wallace falsely blamed the 2025 Potomac River mid-air collision on an uninvolved transgender pilot, claiming it might be "...another trans terror attack."[178] Other conservative figures including Donald Trump Jr. and Ronny Jackson have claimed that transgender people commit disproportionately more violence than other groups, and disinformation around the rate at which transgender people commit violence has spread in conservative media.[179][175][180]

In the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, transgender people were almost immediately subject to accusations of responsibility, especially after The Wall Street Journal falsely reported that an internal ATF memo stated that messages were engraved on the cases of the shooter's ammo which expressed "transgender and anti-fascist ideology."[181] Conservative commentator Joey Mannarino, who had previously expressed his desire for transgender people to be "rounded up, detained and studied", posted on the social media platform X, "If the person who killed Charlie Kirk was a transgender, there can be no mercy for that species any longer. We've already tolerated far too much [from] those creatures".[182] A trans woman from Seattle was accused by numerous conservatives on social media of being the shooter. As a result, she received hundreds of abusive messages, including death threats.[183] The Heritage Foundation has requested that the FBI label "transgender extremists" as a domestic terror threat.[177][184] In May 2026, the White House issued a counterterrorism strategy seeking to prioritize the "neutralization" of "violent secular political groups whose ideology is anti-American, radically pro-transgender, and anarchist."[101][185][186]

Numbers vary across study and methodology, depending on factors such as how such crimes are defined, but they do not show a disproportionate rate of violence among transgender people. According to an analysis by the Poynter Institute, transgender people represent 0.1–1.5% of shooters in the US, and make up 0.5–1.6% of the population.[180] Experts on gun violence agree that transgender people do not represent a disproportionate threat, with human security professor Laura Dugan calling the threat of transgender shooters "just not a concern".[180]

In the arts

In response to Executive Order 14168, the National Endowment for the Arts began forcing all grant applicants to agree not to promote "gender ideology".[187]

Following this, the Trump Administration removed from publicly-run museums works which depicted transgender topics or which were made by transgender artists, with The New Yorker describing this by saying that the administration was "just as likely to censor a painting of a trans person by a cis woman as a painting of a cis woman by a trans person".[188] One example such was the National Portrait Gallery removing Amy Sherald's painting "Trans Forming America", which depicted the Statue of Liberty as a Black trans woman.[188][189][190]

Likewise, privately run institutions began censoring and removing the works of transgender artists as well, in what was speculated by some[by whom?] to be a move to appease donors.[188]

Transgender writers, especially trans women, faced extreme difficulty in getting their work published, with many forced to turn to self-publishing in order to bring their work to audiences. However, this too became difficult as payment processors began to demand that platforms censor works related to LGBTQ topics.[191]

In April 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) launched a public review of the TV Parental Guidelines ratings system on the inclusion of "gender identity issues" in children's television programming.[192][193]

In academia

The National Science Foundation compiled an internal list of words which, if present in a research paper, grant application, or other relevant documentation, would flag a project and put its funding under review. Words that would initiate a review included "gender", "LGBT", and "women", among others.[194][195] Some transgender scholars reported having their fellowships cut, and being told by the federal government that it was for "promoting gender ideology".[188]

NASA took down webpages relating to LGBTQ+ employee resource groups and diversity at the organization, and according to employees, verbally informed its employees that any display of LGBTQ+ symbols, such as a pride flag in one's workspace, would result in the employee being placed on administrative leave.[196]

Universities

Many major universities during this time, either faced with potential loss of federal funding, changes in state law, or simply of their own accord, began to implement restrictions both on the rights of transgender students and on the teaching of material related to gender identity. This included barring transgender students from gender-segregated housing and facilities,[197] banning transgender athletes and stripping away any previously won accolades,[198] firing professors who gave instruction that contravened the Trump Administration's position on transgender people,[199] ceasing the provision of gender affirming hormone therapy to transgender students,[200] and destroying books that covered transgender topics.[201]

In May 2026, the administration announced that it was investigating Smith College, a women's college in Northampton, Massachusetts, for allowing transgender students to attend, alleging that the policy was a violation of Title IX.[202]

International actions

The Trump administration's anti-transgender agenda has not been confined to U.S. borders but has also been aggressively promoted in international forums, particularly at the United Nations. American delegates have repeatedly objected to the inclusion of the word "gender" in resolutions across a wide range of issues, from global health and women's rights to environmental treaties on chemical pollution. By insisting that only "biological sex" be recognized in official documents, U.S. representatives have disrupted negotiations, slowed consensus-building, and aligned American positions with those of more repressive regimes.[203]

Human rights experts warn that these interventions send a global signal that the rights of transgender, non-binary, and intersex people are negotiable, undermining decades of international progress toward gender equality.[204][205][206] The Trump administration has also tied its stance to broader nationalist goals, suggesting that foreign aid may be contingent on countries adopting similar language, thereby leveraging U.S. power to export its anti-trans policies abroad.[203]

The 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices that was released under the second Trump administration was noted for the complete removal of any mention of discrimination and violence against LGBTQ people compared to previous reports.[207][208]

During the 90 day pause on aid funding, a waiver was issued to continue providing HIV treatment during the pause,[209][210] but this waiver excluded the provision of such treatment for gay men, bisexual men, and transgender women.[25]

Foreign policy

At the United Nations, the United States under Trump routinely uses their influence action against transgender rights globally, even when unrelated to the topic of discussion. For example, in a June 2025 meeting on chemical pollution, the American delegate made a point of repeatedly disputing any gender-related language that did not explicitly "recognize women are biologically female and men are biologically male";[211] in another case, the United States disapproved of a declaration supporting the rights of women and girls because it included no language to exclude trans women from its purview. Both advocates and the Trump Administration have suggested that the United States might use compliance at the UN as a metric for determining which countries receive foreign aid.[211]

In January 2026, the Trump administration expanded the Mexico City Rule, which blocked funding or aid to any organization providing or promoting abortion, to likewise block funding and aid to any organization that takes part in or promotes "gender ideology".[212]

In March 2026, the Trump administration successfully pressured the International Olympic Committee (IOC) into banning trans women and intersex athletes from competing in female events at the 2028 Summer Olympics and future Olympic games.[213] All potential Olympic athletes must undergo a one-time SRY screening before being permitted to compete in the female category. IOC president Kirsty Coventry stated that the new policy was "based on science" and was made because "it is absolutely clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category".[214] In a joint statement published several days before the official IOC announcement, over 100 human rights and other groups criticized the proposed rule change as "a blunt and discriminatory response that is not supported by science and violates international human rights law".[215][216]

Effects

Emigration and attempts at seeking asylum

The Trump administration's actions targeting transgender people have led some transgender Americans to seek refuge abroad.[217] Advocacy organizations and media outlets reported an increase in transgender people leaving the United States or making plans to do so in response to the rollback of rights, workplace exclusions, and the Trump administration's rhetoric portraying transgender identities as a social threat.[218][219][220]

In March 2025, Yes! documented cases of transgender asylum seekers in Mexico who cited fear of persecution under Trump's executive orders and anti-trans policies. These asylum seekers said that relocating was a matter of personal safety.[221]

Canadian media reported U.S. transgender families preparing "go bags" and considering asylum after Trump's re-election, citing fears over bathroom bills, the loss of gender-affirming care, and restrictions on passports.[222][223][224] Immigration attorneys in Canada reported a surge of inquiries from transgender and non-binary Americans seeking to relocate or claim asylum after Trump's January 2025 executive orders. Lawyers cited widespread fears over loss of gender-affirming care, restrictions on passports, and safety concerns, and noted that several test cases could establish precedent for U.S. transgender nationals claiming refugee protection in Canada.[220][225][226] In July 2025, Justice Julie Blackhawk of the Canadian Federal Court blocked the deportation of a non-binary person who overstayed their visitor visa in Canada, pending further judicial rulings. Blackhawk ruled that the pre-removal risk assessment conducted by an immigration officer had "failed to consider recent evidence of the conditions that may have supported a reasonable fear of persecution" under present conditions for LGBTQ+ people in the United States.[227]

In April 2025, the Green Party in Norway proposed granting asylum to transgender Americans on the grounds that they were being persecuted, with Green Party politician Karina Ødegård comparing their situation to marginalized groups in 1930s Germany. The proposal drew attention in European media and was framed as part of a broader debate about democratic backsliding and human rights in the United States.[228][229] In August 2025, a 28-year-old transgender woman from California, Veronica Clifford-Carlos, challenged the Dutch government's rejection of her asylum claim. Her case, supported by the Dutch NGO LGBT Asylum Support, was described as the first of its kind in the Netherlands, which reported a rise in U.S. citizens applying for asylum since Trump's return to office.[230]

Genocide debate

A number of advocacy and genocide-prevention groups have warned that the cumulative effect of federal and state measures targeting transgender people exhibits genocidal dynamics or "red flags," particularly when coupled with eliminationist rhetoric in public life.[231] These analyses point to policies and statements seeking to remove legal recognition of transgender identity, restrict access to healthcare, and exclude transgender people from public institutions, and argue that such measures can inflict serious bodily or mental harm on an identifiable group.[231][232] Commentary has also highlighted public calls to "eradicate transgenderism from public life," which critics characterize as eliminationist or genocidal rhetoric, even where speakers distinguish between "transgenderism" and transgender people.[233][234][235]

Many legal scholars argue that transgender people do not meet the Genocide Convention's definition of a protected group, and as such the requirement of intent to physically or biologically destroy a protected group are not satisfied by policies that target transgender people as such, even if the measures cause serious harm.[236] Legal scholarship from 2024 assessing state-level anti-trans legislation in the United States concluded that these actions likely did not meet the legal definition of genocide, while emphasizing the severity of harms imposed.[237]

In January 2026, journalist Walker Bragman interviewed three genocide scholars who were concerned that the US was at the "early stages of committing genocide" against transgender people. Former presidents of the International Association of Genocide Scholars Henry Theriault and Gregory Stanton explained that the Trump administration wanted "to destroy a gender group," accuse them of corrupting traditional and family values, marginalize them socially and economically partly in order to urge them to kill themselves, and give tacit permission to law enforcers to use force specifically against them. Experts on genocide Stanton and Haley Brown deemed these tactics to be "directly borrowed from the Nazis."[1][238]

Comparison to persecution of LGBTQ people in Nazi Germany

Raid on the Institute for Sexual Research by Nazis, May 6, 1933

Commentators and scholars have drawn parallels between the Trump administration's targeting of transgender people and the persecution of LGBTQ people in Nazi Germany. The erasure of research, censorship of language, and targeting of transgender people as a social threat have been repeatedly cited as bearing strong resemblance to the early stages of queer persecution under the Nazi regime.[239][18][240]

In 1933, Nazi students destroyed the Institute for Sexual Research in Berlin, founded by Jewish sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld, which had pioneered studies of gender identity and medical transition. Its library of research on transgender and queer lives was burned, an act widely seen as the beginning of the Nazi regime's systematic erasure of queer culture and knowledge.[160][241] LGBTQ people were later targeted under the Nazi regime through imprisonment, medical experimentation, and, in the case of homosexual men, internment marked by the pink triangle symbol. Several observers have compared this destruction of knowledge with the Trump administration's removal of federal webpages and health datasets referencing transgender populations in early 2025, following executive orders banning "gender ideology." Entire sections of research on HIV, contraceptive use, health equity, and workplace discrimination disappeared from government sites. Critics have described these actions as a form of internet-age book burning.[239][43]

Parallels have also been drawn between Nazi use of broad ideological categories such as "un-German" and the Trump administration's emphasis on opposing "DEI" or "gender ideology." According to scholars, both function as umbrella terms that designate targeted groups as enemies of the nation and justify their exclusion from public life.[239]

Condemnation

On January 28, 2025, over 170 women's rights organizations, led by the National Women's Law Center, issued an open letter condemning Executive Order 14168. The letter described the order, which defined legal recognition of women strictly by reproductive biology and sought to restrict transgender rights, as "cruel and lawless."[242] The organizations argued that its true intent was to stigmatize and discriminate against transgender, non-binary, and intersex people while enforcing gender stereotypes.[242][243][244]

On November 18, 2025, 213 Democratic representatives signed a letter to House speaker Mike Johnson condemning the use of "demonizing and dehumanizing" language about transgender people.[245][246]

Litigation

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Bragman 2026.
  2. Jones 2025, pp. 69, 79–80.
  3. Rogers & Christian 2025, p. 2.
  4. St. James 2022; Levin 2024; Washington & Musgrave 2025; Harmon 2026a
  5. Barrón-López et al. 2024; Whitehead & Perry 2025, p. 1; Wendling & Epstein 2025; Ferguson 2025, p. 112; Brooks & Green 2026, p. 24; Harmon 2026a; Nunn 2026, pp. 218–219
  6. Colvin, Jill (November 12, 2023). "Trump's plans if he returns to the White House include deportation raids, tariffs and mass firings". Associated Press. Archived from the original on March 4, 2026.
  7. Rand 2025, p. 425; Alfonseca & Kim 2024; Gabbatt 2024
  8. Rand 2025, pp. 430–431.
  9. 1 2 Quinan 2025, p. 530.
  10. Weill, Kate; Briquelet, Kelly (June 30, 2023). "Trump Says He'll Ban Federal Government From Promoting Transgender Care at Any Age". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on July 21, 2025.
  11. Roarty, Alex (July 14, 2023). "It's trans adults, too: GOP candidates now back trans medical restrictions for all ages". Semafor. Archived from the original on February 6, 2026.
  12. Cruz, Liset; Bianco, Ali; Messerly, Megan; Bhattacharyya, Abhinanda; Wiederkehr, Anna (May 2, 2025). "37 ways Project 2025 has shown up in Trump's executive orders". Politico. Archived from the original on April 18, 2026.
  13. Blessett & Meyer 2025, pp. 2–5; Quinan 2025, pp. 531, 542–543; King & Sanatkar 2025, pp. 476–477
  14. Becker, Amanda; Rummler, Orion; Padilla, Mariel (December 24, 2025). "Tracking how much of Project 2025 the Trump administration achieved this year". PBS News. Archived from the original on February 20, 2026.
  15. Klapsa 2023; Riedel 2025a; Murib 2026, p. 165
  16. "United States v. Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter for Tennessee, et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit" (PDF). United States Supreme Court. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 12, 2025.
  17. Mulvihill 2025; Slater 2025; Thoreson 2025
  18. 1 2 "From rhetoric to persecution: When the State labels trans people as terrorists". Los Angeles Blade. October 2, 2025. Archived from the original on November 29, 2025.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government". White House. January 21, 2025. Archived from the original on January 21, 2025.
  20. Johansen 2025; Slater 2025; Nunn 2026, pp. 196–197
  21. 1 2 Harmon 2026a.
  22. 1 2 3 4 Christensen 2025a.
  23. Nunn 2026, pp. 196–197.
  24. 1 2 Mulvihill 2025.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Middleton 2025.
  26. Demopoulos, Alaina (January 22, 2025). "'A twist of the knife': trans Americans respond to Trump's executive order". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 19, 2025. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
  27. 1 2 Guerrero Mc Manus 2025, p. 2.
  28. 1 2 Nauright, Ratcliff & Zipp 2025, p. 11.
  29. "US judge rules prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans people". The Guardian. Reuters. June 3, 2025. Archived from the original on February 20, 2026.
  30. Dewan, Shaila (February 5, 2025). "Judge Blocks Trump Effort to Move Trans Women to Men's Prisons". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 9, 2025. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  31. "Judge tells agencies to restore webpages and data removed after Trump's executive order". STAT. Associated Press. February 11, 2025. Archived from the original on February 14, 2025. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
  32. Dewan, Shaila (February 5, 2025). "Judge Blocks Trump Effort to Move Trans Women to Men's Prisons". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 27, 2025.
  33. 1 2 "Judge blocks Trump's orders to curb youth gender transition care". The Washington Post. March 1, 2025. Archived from the original on March 6, 2025. Retrieved March 8, 2025.
  34. Freilich & Kesselheim 2025, pp. 227–228.
  35. Galvin, Gabriela (July 4, 2025). "Trump officials 'secretly' changed US health data in 'gender ideology' crackdown, researchers allege". Euronews. Archived from the original on August 26, 2025. Retrieved July 4, 2025.
  36. "New Trump administration rule bars student loan relief for public workers tied to 'illegal' activity". AP News. October 30, 2025. Archived from the original on November 1, 2025. Retrieved October 31, 2025.
  37. Harmon, Amy (November 17, 2025). "New Passport Rule Sends Blunt and Sweeping Message to Trans Americans". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 9, 2026.
  38. Saad 2025.
  39. Heidt, Amanda (February 4, 2025). "'Mind-boggling': US CDC orders gender-related terms cut from scientific papers". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00367-x. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39905253.
  40. Upadhyay, Brajesh (February 14, 2025). "Transgender references removed from Stonewall monument website". BBC News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2025.
  41. 1 2 McGrady 2026.
  42. 1 2 Jacobs, Phie (February 7, 2025). "How a cancer researcher lost a gender-related grant to Trump's executive orders". Science. Archived from the original on April 26, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  43. Allebeck et al. 2025, pp. 195–196.
  44. Clark & Abbasi 2025, p. r253.
  45. Gallego-Mackie, Kyle; Haney, Taylor; Fadel, Leila; Rezvani, Arezou (April 14, 2025). "Scientists worry about free speech rights under the Trump administration". NPR. Archived from the original on October 16, 2025. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  46. Lee McFarling, Usha; Chen, Angus; Owermohle, Sarah (February 13, 2025). "Growing number of federal health agencies are combing grants for taboo words, unnerving researchers". STAT. Archived from the original on September 26, 2025. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  47. Watson, Kathryn; Watson, Eleanor; Cook, Sara (January 28, 2025). "Trump signs executive orders for military, focusing on transgender service members, COVID, diversity". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 21, 2025. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
  48. Wiggins, Joseph & Bishop 2025, p. 299; Mulvihill 2025; McCauley 2025; Middleton 2025
  49. "US judge blocks Trump's ban on trans people serving in the military". The Guardian. Associated Press. March 18, 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 21, 2025. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
  50. Slayton, Nicholas (June 9, 2025). "US military's highest ranking transgender officer says separation process is broken". Task & Purpose. Archived from the original on August 14, 2025. Retrieved June 13, 2025.
  51. Toropin, Konstantin (August 7, 2025). "US Air Force to deny retirement pay to transgender service members being separated from the service". AP News. Archived from the original on August 7, 2025. Retrieved August 7, 2025.
  52. Botelho, Jessica A. (October 31, 2025). "Pentagon policy change lets commanders override decisions on transgender troops' status". WJAR. Archived from the original on November 29, 2025.
  53. Toropin, Konstantin (October 31, 2025). "New Pentagon policy undercuts trans troops' ability to ask to stay in the military, AP learns". Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 29, 2025.
  54. Wiggins, Christopher (November 3, 2025). "New Pentagon memo dictates how transgender troops must look to defend their service". The Advocate. Archived from the original on November 7, 2025.
  55. Butler, Kelsey; Nahmias, Laura (February 5, 2025). "NYC Hospitals Halt Some Gender Affirming Care After Trump Order". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on August 25, 2025. Retrieved April 25, 2025.
  56. Nunn 2026, pp. 220–221.
  57. 1 2 "Some hospitals pause gender-affirming care to evaluate Trump's executive order". NBC News. Associated Press. January 31, 2025. Archived from the original on August 31, 2025. Retrieved February 1, 2025.
  58. Wiggins, Joseph & Bishop 2025, p. 299; Rand 2025, pp. 432–433; Rama-Poccia 2025
  59. 1 2 3 4 5 Montague 2025.
  60. 1 2 McCauley 2025.
  61. Strack, Haley (January 28, 2025). "Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Gender Mutilation". National Review. Archived from the original on March 20, 2026.
  62. Yurcaba, Jo (February 4, 2025). "Trans young adults and parents sue over Trump's orders restricting transition care". NBC News. Archived from the original on April 6, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2025.
  63. Johnson, Carla K.; Bose, Devna; Bargfeld, Laura (January 30, 2025). "Some hospitals pause gender-affirming care to evaluate Trump's executive order". Associated Press. Archived from the original on March 30, 2026.
  64. Ambus, Destini (February 20, 2025). "Memorial Health no longer doing gender-affirming care for those under 19; cancels all appointments". Savannah Now. Archived from the original on December 20, 2025. Retrieved February 22, 2025.
  65. "El Rio, one of Tucson's largest LGBTQ healthcare providers, removes transgender care from website". Tucson Sentinel. February 17, 2025. Archived from the original on February 18, 2025. Retrieved April 21, 2025.
  66. Harmon, Amy; Macur, Juliet (February 13, 2025). "Judge Temporarily Stops Trump's Plan to End Funds for Trans Youths' Health Providers". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 13, 2025. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
  67. "UVA Health set to resume transgender care services". CBS News. February 13, 2025. Archived from the original on February 16, 2025. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
  68. "Phoenix clinic to resume gender-affirming care for children paused by Trump order". The Arizona Republic. February 15, 2025. Archived from the original on February 17, 2025. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
  69. Factora, James (August 21, 2025). "DOJ Demands "Every Writing or Record" of Trans Youth Care From Hospitals". Them.us. Archived from the original on February 17, 2026.
  70. Cameron, Dell (August 23, 2025). "US Government Seeks Medical Records of Trans Youth". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on March 1, 2026.
  71. Ogles, Jacob (June 9, 2026). "Mount Sinai criticized for sharing trans patient records". The Advocate. Retrieved July 3, 2026.
  72. Raymond, Nate (July 2, 2026). "US judge blocks DOJ from obtaining transgender care records from California hospital". Reuters. Retrieved July 3, 2026.
  73. Ennis, Dawn (May 19, 2026). "Texas judge demands trans kids medical records by midnight". The Advocate. Retrieved July 3, 2026.
  74. Simmons-Duffin, Selena (October 30, 2025). "Trump pushes an end to medical care for transgender youth nationally". NPR. Archived from the original on December 19, 2025.
  75. Cruz, Liset; Bianco, Ali; Messerly, Megan; Bhattacharyya, Abhinanda; Wiederkehr, Anna (February 5, 2025). "37 ways Project 2025 has shown up in Trump's executive orders". Politico. Archived from the original on March 17, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2025.
  76. Quinn, Melissa (February 3, 2025). "Where Trump policies and Project 2025 proposals match up". CBS News. Archived from the original on March 31, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2025.
  77. Weixel, Nathaniel (May 15, 2026). "Texas Children's Hospital must create country's first 'detransition clinic' under settlement with Paxton". The Hill. Retrieved May 23, 2026.
  78. Langford, Terri; DeGuzman, Colleen (May 15, 2026). "Texas Children's Hospital to create clinic reversing trans care". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on May 16, 2026. Retrieved May 15, 2026.
  79. Stevens, Michael (June 10, 2026). "Cleveland Clinic's Detransition Deal slammed as 'Performative'". PinkNews. Retrieved June 12, 2026.
  80. Office of the Press Secretary (January 29, 2025). "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling". whitehouse.gov. Archived from the original on February 21, 2025. Retrieved September 1, 2025 via National Archives.
  81. Perez & Wilkes 2025.
  82. "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling". The White House. January 29, 2025. Archived from the original on February 21, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
  83. Cochran, Lexi Lonas (January 29, 2025). "Trump signs executive order to defund schools teaching CRT, 'radical gender ideology'". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 7, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
  84. Perez & Wilkes 2025; Mulvihill 2025
  85. Lang, Nico (January 31, 2025). "How Trump's "Radical Indoctrination" Executive Order Targets Trans Youth in Schools". Them.us. Archived from the original on February 21, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
  86. Christensen, Jen (August 27, 2025). "Trump administration threatens to pull federal funding from sex ed programs that mention transgender people". CNN. Archived from the original on August 27, 2025. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
  87. Sherman, Carter (October 28, 2025). "Trump demanded trans issues be excluded from sex education. 11 states complied". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 16, 2025.
  88. Dunbar, Marina (February 5, 2025). "Trump signs executive order banning trans athletes from women's sports". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on June 7, 2025. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  89. "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports". The White House. February 5, 2025. Archived from the original on February 6, 2025. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  90. 1 2 Yurcaba 2025a.
  91. Walsh, Sheri (February 11, 2025). "Education Department urges NCAA to erase records set by transgender athletes". United Press International. Archived from the original on March 9, 2026.
  92. Gedeon, Joseph (February 25, 2025). "US threatens permanent visa bans on trans athletes based on sex markers". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 23, 2025. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  93. "Initial Rescissions Of Harmful Executive Orders And Actions". The White House. January 20, 2025. Archived from the original on April 28, 2026. Retrieved January 21, 2025.
  94. Schmidt, Samantha; Wax-Thibodeaux, Emily; Balingit, Moriah (January 21, 2021). "Biden calls for LGBTQ protections in Day 1 executive order, angering conservatives". The Washington Post.
  95. Ferguson 2025, p. 111.
  96. Hansford, Amelia (December 17, 2025). "Pam Bondi wants FBI to put cash bounties on trans activists". Pink News. Archived from the original on December 19, 2025. Retrieved December 18, 2025.
  97. Collington, Faefyx (December 16, 2025). "Pam Bondi wants the government to create cash bounties for turning in trans equality activists". LGBTQ Nation. Archived from the original on December 19, 2025.
  98. 1 2 "United States Counterterrorism Strategy" (PDF). whitehouse.gov. May 2026. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 7, 2026.
  99. Schwartzapfel, Beth (February 19, 2026). "Federal Prisons Bar Gender-Affirming Care for Trans People". The Marshall Project. Archived from the original on February 26, 2026. Retrieved February 20, 2026.
  100. Schreiber, Melody (February 27, 2026). "Science of sex and gender being misrepresented by Trump officials, experts warn". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 27, 2026.
  101. Monteil, Abby (March 10, 2026). "Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy". Them.us. Archived from the original on March 29, 2026.
  102. Pisoni, Hope (February 21, 2026). "We Spoke to 8 Trans Inmates. They Say the Bureau of Prisons Is Illegally Denying Them Care". Uncloseted Media. Archived from the original on March 15, 2026.
  103. Kalish, Levi (February 7, 2026). "ICE Is Treating Trans Immigrants With A New Level Of Cruelty". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 28, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  104. Russell, John (April 30, 2026). "Trans activist denied basic rights & medical care in ICE custody: "They did not give us enough food"". LGBTQ Nation.
  105. "ICE is Excluding Data on Transgender People in Detention". Vera Institute of Justice. July 7, 2018. Archived from the original on September 19, 2025. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
  106. Dodds, Io (December 6, 2025). "Trump DoJ 'immediately' stops enforcing prison rape protections for trans and intersex people, according to leaked memo". The Independent. Archived from the original on March 10, 2026.
  107. 1 2 3 Levin, Sam (December 5, 2025). "DoJ moves to eliminate sexual abuse protections for LGBTQ+ people in prisons". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 18, 2025.
  108. Jenkins, Jimmy (December 9, 2025). "Trump Administration Ditches Protections for Transgender Inmates". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on January 5, 2026.
  109. Diaz, Jaclyn (December 4, 2025). "DOJ orders prison inspectors to stop considering LGBTQ safety standards". NPR. Archived from the original on December 9, 2025. Retrieved January 5, 2026.
  110. Villareal, Daniel (December 5, 2025). "Trump just told inspectors to stop tracking anti-LGBTQ+ prison rapes". LGBTQ Nation. Q.Digital, Inc. Archived from the original on December 13, 2025. Retrieved January 5, 2026.
  111. Perez, Evan; Rabinowitz, Hannah (September 4, 2025). "Trump DOJ is looking at ways to ban transgender Americans from owning guns, sources say". CNN. Archived from the original on September 4, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
  112. Woodward, Alex (September 4, 2025). "Trump looking to ban transgender people from having a gun and declaring them 'mentally ill': report". The Independent. Archived from the original on September 4, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
  113. 1 2 3 Richer, Alanna Durkin (September 5, 2025). "Justice Department talks about banning transgender gun owners spark fury across political spectrum". Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 5, 2025. Retrieved September 7, 2025.
  114. Woodward, Alex (September 5, 2025). "Even the NRA is against Trump team plan to ban trans people from owning firearms". The Independent. Archived from the original on September 5, 2025. Retrieved September 5, 2025.
  115. Dorgan, Michael; Oliver, Ashley (September 6, 2025). "NRA speaks out as Trump administration mulls possible trans firearms ban". FOX 13 Tampa Bay. Archived from the original on November 13, 2025.
  116. Meyer et al. 2026, pp. 70–71.
  117. Cordes, Nancy; Watson, Kathryn; Linton, Caroline; Hubbard, Kaia; Quinn, Melissa; Brown, Kristin; Escobedo, Richard (January 28, 2025). "Trump administration orders federal funding freeze on all public loans, grants and more aid". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 13, 2025. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
  118. Greer et al. 2025, p. 4.
  119. Reed, Russ (April 11, 2025). "$1.5M in funding pulled from Maine Department of Corrections over transgender inmate, Bondi says". WMTW. Archived from the original on May 13, 2025.
  120. WGME Staff (April 16, 2025). "Department of Justice doubles down on cuts to Maine's prison system". Fox 23 Maine. Archived from the original on July 24, 2025.
  121. Skinner-Thompson, Scott (September 2, 2025). "Transgender Disenfranchisement". Washington University Law Review.
  122. Munroe, Morgan (February 21, 2025). "Trump Is Now Threatening Trans Voting Rights". Slate. Archived from the original on April 23, 2026. Retrieved April 22, 2026.
  123. Maluf, Emmy (March 2024). "Voting While Trans: How Voter ID Laws Unconstitutionally Compel the Speech of Trans Voters". Michigan Law Review. 122 (5): 927. doi:10.36644/mlr.122.5.voting. Archived from the original on April 22, 2025.
  124. "Anti-trans laws may complicate access to the ballot for trans voters". ACLU Tennessee. September 19, 2024. Archived from the original on February 10, 2026.
  125. Schreiber, Melody (December 17, 2025). "House approves MTG-sponsored bill to criminalize gender transition treatment for minors". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 19, 2025. Retrieved December 19, 2025.
  126. "ACLU Condemns House Passage of Bill to Criminalize Transgender Health Care". American Civil Liberties Union. December 17, 2025. Archived from the original on December 19, 2025.
  127. 1 2 Ghorayshi, Azeen; Harmon, Amy; Abelson, Reed (December 18, 2025). "Trump Moves to End Gender-Related Care for Minors, Threatening Hospitals That Offer It". The New York Times.
  128. Protecting Children. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. December 18, 2025 via YouTube.
  129. 1 2 Lemkin Institute 2026.
  130. Yurcaba, Jo (May 26, 2026). "It's not just kids: Trump's crackdown on trans healthcare extends into adulthood". NBC News. Archived from the original on May 31, 2026. the administration's actions and the resulting impacts have been far broader, blocking thousands of adults — including veterans, longtime government employees and older teens — from getting healthcare they need.
  131. 1 2 Dunbar 2025b.
  132. 1 2 Harmon 2026b.
  133. Shumway, Julia (December 24, 2025). "Oregon leads lawsuit over Kennedy's efforts to ban gender-affirming care for minors". Oregon Capital Chronicle. Archived from the original on January 1, 2026. Retrieved May 7, 2026.
  134. Schreiber, Melody (April 23, 2026). "RFK Jr agenda suffers another loss as trans advocates hail 'huge step forward'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on April 29, 2026. Retrieved May 7, 2026.
  135. Wiggins, Christopher (April 18, 2026). "Federal judge blocks 'unserious' RFK Jr. trans care ban". The Advocate. Archived from the original on April 23, 2026. Retrieved May 7, 2026.
  136. Wiggins, Christopher (May 8, 2026). "D.C. judge issues dual victories for transgender health care". The Advocate. Archived from the original on May 10, 2026. Retrieved May 9, 2026.
  137. DeMillo, Andrew; Hanna, John; Lathan, Nadia (January 22, 2025). "Republican-led states emboldened to continue rolling back trans rights as Democrats struggle with response". PBS News. Public Broadcasting Services. Associated Press. Retrieved September 8, 2025.
  138. Farr, Harrold & Polyak 2026, p. 88.
  139. Cole, Jared P.; Donley, Madeline W. (July 1, 2025). United States v. Skrmetti: Supreme Court Affirms State Ban Against Certain Medical Treatments for Transgender Minors (Report). Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original on June 25, 2025 via Congress.gov. The Court in Skrmetti ruled that Tennessee's law did not classify based on sex or transgender status and was not subject to heightened scrutiny. Rather, the law made two classifications—based on age and medical use—subject to the deferential rational basis standard of review. (...) After determining that rational basis review applied to SB1, the Court held that the law "clearly meets th[at] standard." (...) While the Court acknowledged that the "excluded diagnoses" necessarily involve some reference to sex, in the majority's view, "the application of that prohibition does not turn on sex." The majority did not address whether transgender individuals constitute a quasi-suspect class because, in its view, SB1 does not classify based on whether or not an individual is transgender. (...) The Court pointed to Geduldig v. Aiello (...) the majority also found it unnecessary to address whether the reasoning of a different case, Bostock v. Clayton County, applied to the equal protection analysis. (...) The dissenting Justices argued that SB1 expressly classifies on the basis of sex and should have been reviewed under intermediate scrutiny.
  140. Parks, Casey (December 17, 2025). "Marjorie Taylor Greene's sweeping anti-trans care bill passes House". The Washington Post.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  141. Serwer, Adam (January 29, 2025). "The Attack on Trans Rights Won't End There". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on February 17, 2025.
  142. Rand 2025, pp. 432–433.
  143. Guerrero, Desiree (March 11, 2026). "U.S. court allows state bans on gender-affirming care for adults in unprecedented ruling". The Advocate. Archived from the original on March 12, 2026. Retrieved March 13, 2026.
  144. Wiessner, Daniel (March 10, 2026). "West Virginia can ban Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgery, US court rules". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 15, 2026.
  145. Chandler, Kim; Hanna, John; Riddle, Safiyah. "More GOP-led states seek to follow Trump's lead in defining male and female". Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 4, 2025. Retrieved September 5, 2025.
  146. Vasquez, Lucio (August 29, 2025). "Texas 'bathroom bill' with new restrictions on transgender people nears governor's desk". Texas Public Radio. Archived from the original on August 30, 2025. Retrieved August 31, 2025.
  147. "Alaska medical board approves draft to discipline providers of gender-affirming care for youth". Associated Press. August 22, 2025. Archived from the original on August 30, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  148. Lobo, Arpan (October 4, 2025). "Proposed VPN ban in Michigan is concerning, tech watchdog says". Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on December 19, 2025.
  149. Cole, Samantha (September 16, 2025). "Michigan Lawmakers Are Attempting to Ban Porn Entirely". 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2025.
  150. Monteil, Abby (September 16, 2025). "Michigan Republican Bill Bans All Online Porn and Depictions of Trans People". Them.us. Archived from the original on October 6, 2025.
  151. Smith, Sherman; Chilson, Morgan (February 27, 2026). "Trans Kansans struggle with reality of Legislature's 'cruelty' as driver's licenses are invalidated". Kansas Reflector. Archived from the original on May 9, 2026. Retrieved February 27, 2026.
  152. Tracer, Dan (February 27, 2026). ""The Persecution Is The Point": Kansas Voids Trans Residents' IDs". Go Mag. Archived from the original on March 11, 2026.
  153. Mitchell, Schuyler (November 2025). "How the right uses "gender ideology" to blame trans people for everything". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on December 30, 2025. Retrieved December 29, 2025.
  154. 1 2 3 4 Yousef, Odette (February 6, 2025). "Trump's anti-trans effort is an agenda cornerstone with echoes in history". NPR. Archived from the original on August 27, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
  155. Crowley, Kinsey (March 15, 2025). "Trump shared an article with a pink triangle symbol: Why critics are alarmed". USA Today. Archived from the original on March 19, 2025.
  156. Lavietes, Matt (September 9, 2024). "Trump repeats false claims that children are undergoing transgender surgery during the school day". NBC News. Archived from the original on September 9, 2025. Retrieved December 3, 2024.
  157. "Health Misinformation Monitor: Falsehoods About Transgender People and Gender Affirming Care". KFF. October 10, 2024. Archived from the original on May 6, 2025. Retrieved December 3, 2024.
  158. Lennard, Natasha (February 25, 2026). "Democrats Should Never Again Rise to Trump's Anti-Trans Bait". The Intercept. Archived from the original on March 1, 2026.
  159. "Read NPR's annotated fact check of President Trump's State of the Union". NPR. February 24, 2026. Archived from the original on March 7, 2026.
  160. Harmon, Amy (February 11, 2025). "How Trump Uses Language to Attack the Idea of Transgender Identity". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 3, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
  161. Klein, Charlotte (February 15, 2023). "Nearly 200 New York Times Contributors Are Denouncing the Paper's Anti-Trans Coverage". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on March 15, 2026. Retrieved March 21, 2026.
  162. Mastrangelo, Dominick (February 16, 2023). "NYT editors: Paper 'will not tolerate' its journalists protesting coverage of transgender people". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 30, 2025.
  163. Yang, Mary (February 15, 2023). "'New York Times' stories on trans youth slammed by writers — including some of its own". NPR. Archived from the original on March 26, 2026. Retrieved March 21, 2026.
  164. Hansford, Amelia (January 2, 2026). "Ex-New York Times editor claims senior staff are 'militantly' anti-trans". PinkNews. Archived from the original on February 25, 2026. Retrieved March 16, 2026.
  165. Monteil, Abby (January 2, 2026). "Former New York Times Editor Says Paper's Anti-Trans Slant Came From the Top". Them.us. Archived from the original on March 30, 2026. Retrieved March 21, 2026.
  166. Harris, Rob (February 6, 2025). "Donald Trump's trans athletes rhetoric resonated with voters concerned about sporting fairness". Sky News. Archived from the original on September 6, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
  167. Yurcaba, Jo (March 5, 2025). "Fact-checking Trump's anti-transgender comments in his address to Congress". NBC News. Archived from the original on April 15, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
  168. 1 2 Ring, Trudy (September 11, 2025). "After Charlie Kirk's death, Trump Jr. falsely claims trans people more dangerous than al-Qaeda". The Advocate. Archived from the original on September 23, 2025. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
  169. 1 2 Carless, Will (August 27, 2025). "No, there is not an 'epidemic' of shootings by trans people". USA Today. Archived from the original on September 19, 2025. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
  170. 1 2 Dodds, Io (September 19, 2025). "Group behind Project 2025 urges FBI to brand 'transgender extremists' a domestic terror threat". The Independent. Archived from the original on September 23, 2025. Retrieved September 19, 2025.
  171. Riedel, Samantha (July 2, 2025). "Hoaxers Have Falsely Blamed Trans People for Violent "Terror Attacks" 12 Times Since 2022". Them.us. Archived from the original on September 22, 2025. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
  172. Walker, Hunter (September 18, 2025). "Texas Congressman Says Trans People Need To Be Taken 'Off The Streets' After Charlie Kirk Shooting". Talking Points Memo. Archived from the original on September 23, 2025. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
  173. 1 2 3 Abels, Grace (February 27, 2024). "There's no evidence of rising LGBTQ+ violent extremism or 'trans terrorism'". Poynter Institute. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 19, 2025.
  174. Migdon, Brooke (September 12, 2025). "HRC demands WSJ retract report linking Kirk shooting to transgender community". The Hill. Archived from the original on September 12, 2025. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
  175. Quinlan Houghtaling, Ellie (September 11, 2025). "MAGA Is Already Blaming Trans People for Charlie Kirk's Death". The New Republic. Archived from the original on September 22, 2025. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
  176. Wiggins, Christopher (September 12, 2025). "No, this transgender woman is not the Charlie Kirk assassin". The Advocate. Archived from the original on September 19, 2025. Retrieved September 15, 2025.
  177. McCoy 2025; Wiggins, Joseph & Bishop 2025, p. 298; Lemkin Institute 2026
  178. Nerozzi, Diana (May 6, 2026). "Trump counterterrorism strategy targets 'violent left-wing extremists' with 'transgender ideology'". Politico. Retrieved May 7, 2026.
  179. Ogles, Jacob (May 7, 2026). "White House targets 'radically pro-transgender' groups". The Advocate. Archived from the original on May 16, 2026. Retrieved May 7, 2026.
  180. Diep Tran (February 10, 2025). "National Endowment for the Arts to Limit Funding for Programs That Promote Diversity and Gender Expression". Paybill. Archived from the original on February 10, 2025. Retrieved February 10, 2025.
  181. 1 2 3 4 Byron, Grace (September 8, 2025). "The War on Trans Art". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Archived from the original on September 23, 2025. Retrieved September 10, 2025.
  182. Battle, Grey (July 24, 2025). "Amy Sherald Called Off Her Smithsonian Show Over 'Censorship'". The Cut. Archived from the original on August 20, 2025. Retrieved July 25, 2025.
  183. Lee, Benjamin (July 24, 2025). "Artist Amy Sherald cancels Smithsonian show over censorship". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on September 2, 2025. Retrieved July 25, 2025.
  184. Bhatt, Talia (October 16, 2025). "Trans women are building their own publishing world, and it's under threat". The Verge. Archived from the original on October 21, 2025. Retrieved October 16, 2025.
  185. Horton, Adrian (April 22, 2026). "Trump's FCC weighs whether to flag shows with trans or non-binary 'programming'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on April 23, 2026. Retrieved April 23, 2026.
  186. Manfredi, Lucas (April 22, 2026). "FCC Launches Review Into TV Parental Guidelines, Concerns Over Depicting 'Gender Identity Issues'". TheWrap. Archived from the original on April 26, 2026. Retrieved April 23, 2026.
  187. Johnson, Carolyn Y.; Dance, Scott; Achenbach, Joel (February 4, 2025). "Here are the words putting science in the crosshairs of Trump's orders". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 13, 2025.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  188. Novak, Matt (February 5, 2025). "The List of Trump's Forbidden Words That Will Get Your Paper Flagged at NSF". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on February 13, 2025. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  189. Dinner, Josh (February 11, 2025). "NASA allegedly orders employees to purge workspaces of LGBTQI+ symbols: Report". Space.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2025. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  190. Wiggins, Christopher (August 5, 2025). "Brown 'functionally inaccessible' for trans students after Trump deal". The Advocate. Archived from the original on September 6, 2025. Retrieved September 10, 2025.
  191. Jones II, Arthur; Deliso, Meredith (July 2, 2025). "University of Pennsylvania reaches agreement with Trump admin over transgender athletes case". ABC News. Archived from the original on August 30, 2025. Retrieved September 10, 2025.
  192. Priest, Jessica; Gutteridge, Nicholas; Nguyen, Alex; Runnels, Ayden (September 9, 2025). "Video of clash over gender-identity content in Texas A&M children's lit class leads to firing, removals". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on September 10, 2025. Retrieved September 10, 2025.
  193. Neas, Cora (September 9, 2025). "UT Austin to stop providing hormones for transgender students". KXAN. Archived from the original on September 10, 2025.
  194. Ogles, Jacob (August 19, 2024). "New College of Florida literally trashes books on gender following Ron DeSantis's takeover of the school". The Advocate. Archived from the original on September 1, 2025. Retrieved September 10, 2025.
  195. Lange, Alex C. (May 6, 2026). "Federal investigation into Smith College probes whether transgender students can attend women's schools – challenging the evolving mission of women's education". The Conversation. Archived from the original on May 12, 2026. Retrieved May 11, 2026.
  196. 1 2 Song, Lisa (August 5, 2025). "The Trump Administration Is Promoting Its Anti-Trans Agenda Globally at the United Nations". ProPublica. Archived from the original on August 11, 2025. Retrieved September 11, 2025.
  197. Deb, Swarupa; Nandan, Aniket (February 4, 2025). "How Trump's mandate on 'biological truth' could hurt transgender activism in South Asia". Scroll.in. Archived from the original on December 13, 2025.
  198. "Executive Orders attacking transgender people cause harm, undermine human rights". Amnesty USA. January 28, 2025. Archived from the original on August 7, 2025.
  199. Paletta, Daniele (January 21, 2025). "Trump's reactionary executive orders harm trans and intersex people and fail to protect women, says ILGA World". International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association. Archived from the original on February 18, 2026.
  200. Kalish, Levi (August 13, 2025). "The Trump Administration Quietly Deleted A Key Resource For LGBTQ+ Asylum-Seekers". HuffPost. Archived from the original on August 13, 2025.
  201. Smith, Graham; Kelemen, Michele; McMillan, Nick; Hurt, Alyson (August 12, 2025). "State Department slashes its annual reports on human rights". NPR. Archived from the original on March 2, 2026.
  202. Shalal, Andrea (February 1, 2025). "US spells out life-saving HIV treatment that can continue during aid pause". Reuters.
  203. "UNAIDS welcomes US decision to keep funding life-saving HIV treatment". UN News. United Nations. January 29, 2025. Archived from the original on January 31, 2025.
  204. 1 2 Song 2025. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFSong2025 (help)
  205. Lewis, Simon (January 22, 2026). "US to expand anti-abortion aid rule to cover 'gender ideology,' diversity". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 15, 2026.
  206. "White House Celebrates Pressuring Olympics Into Banning Trans Women". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on April 9, 2026. Retrieved March 27, 2026.
  207. Ingle, Sean (March 26, 2026). "Transgender women athletes banned from female events at Olympics by IOC". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on April 8, 2026. Retrieved March 26, 2026.
  208. Lewis, Samantha (March 26, 2026). "Human rights experts raise concerns over Olympics transgender women athlete ban". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 7, 2026. Retrieved March 27, 2026.
  209. "Olympics: Sex Testing Harms All Women and Girls". Sport & Rights Alliance. March 17, 2026. Archived from the original on May 11, 2026. Retrieved March 27, 2026.
  210. Dodds 2025b; Dodds 2025a; Pidd & Block 2026; Rector 2025; Burga 2025
  211. Burga 2025.
  212. Artsy, Avishay; King, Noel (October 21, 2025). "Why many transgender Americans are preparing to flee the country". Vox. Archived from the original on April 8, 2026.
  213. 1 2 Serrano 2025.
  214. Flores, Chantal (March 3, 2025). "Safe Havens for Trans Migrants on the U.S.-Mexico Border". YES!. Archived from the original on August 13, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  215. Perlita, Stroh (February 4, 2025). "Trans families consider leaving U.S. after Trump's re-election". CBC. Archived from the original on August 19, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  216. Yurcaba, Jo (June 1, 2025). "These families say they're leaving the U.S. because of its anti-transgender climate". NBC News. Archived from the original on August 29, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  217. Diaz, Jaclyn (February 21, 2025). "Trump's passport policy leaves trans, intersex Americans in the lurch". NPR. Archived from the original on February 28, 2026.
  218. Mordowanec, Nick (April 17, 2025). "Transgender Americans Are Trying To Move to Canada". Newsweek. Archived from the original on August 27, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  219. Woolf, Marie (April 15, 2025). "Scores of transgender Americans seeking route to Canada, including through asylum claims". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on July 20, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  220. Woolf, Marie (July 16, 2025). "Judge halts deportation of non-binary American in landmark ruling after Trump's gender edicts". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on December 10, 2025. Retrieved July 16, 2025.
  221. Theil, Michele (April 11, 2025). "Politician calls for transgender Americans to be offered asylum in Norway: 'We have to act'". PinkNews. Archived from the original on July 24, 2025. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
  222. "MDG vil gi asyl til transpersoner fra USA" [MDG wants to grant asylum to transgender people from the United States]. Miljøpartiet De Grønne (in Norwegian). March 31, 2025. Archived from the original on October 19, 2025. Retrieved November 28, 2025.
  223. Van Campenhout, Charlotte (August 20, 2025). "US trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection". Reuters. Retrieved September 3, 2025.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  224. 1 2 Caton 2024, p. 144; Pal 2024, p. 2372; Osborn 2025, pp. 6–7; Maranto 2025, p. 1; Phillips et al. 2025
  225. Sharp et al. 2025, p. 1.
  226. Lasharie 2023, p. 33.
  227. Dodds 2025a.
  228. van der Ent 2024, pp. 192–193.
  229. Fyfe 2024, pp. 55–61.
  230. Cieslik 2026.
  231. 1 2 3 Fox, Mira (February 6, 2025). "Is the Trump administration's website censorship the internet age version of Nazi book burning?". The Forward. Archived from the original on August 14, 2025. Retrieved September 1, 2025.
  232. Currah 2025; Cieslik 2025; Bahl 2025; Flannery 2025; Clark 2025; Casey 2025
  233. Moss, Ali (March 23, 2025). "The Nazis Made A Horrifying Move In 1933. I'm Terrified Trump Is Now Doing The Exact Same Thing". HuffPost. Archived from the original on August 23, 2025.
  234. 1 2 "Over 170 Organizations Condemn President Trump's Executive Order Targeting Transgender, Nonbinary, and Intersex Individuals". National Women's Law Center. January 28, 2025. Archived from the original on April 20, 2025. Retrieved September 9, 2025.
  235. Berry, Deborah Barfield (January 28, 2025). "Trump order recognizes only two sexes. Advocates call it 'cruel,' 'lawless.'". USA Today. Archived from the original on August 2, 2025. Retrieved September 9, 2025.
  236. "Open Letter" (PDF). National Women's Law Center. January 28, 2025. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 1, 2025.
  237. Owen, Greg (November 18, 2025). "House Dems unite to tell GOP to stop "demonizing" trans people with "dehumanizing" slurs". LGBTQ Nation. Archived from the original on November 25, 2025. Retrieved November 19, 2025.
  238. Reberkenny, Joe (November 18, 2025). "213 House members ask Speaker Johnson to condemn anti-trans rhetoric". Washington Blade. Archived from the original on December 20, 2025. Retrieved November 19, 2025.

Works cited

Further reading