User talk:DatGuy
Add topic
Administrators' newsletter – August 2026
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2026).

- Following an RfC, the 30-day requirement for extended-confirmed status now begins after an account's first edit instead of its registration (T431060).
- Inactive editors can now be removed as mentors at Special:CommunityConfiguration/Mentorship automatically.
- The Suggested Edits' Revise Tone feature is now enabled. It encourages editors to identify and revise non-neutral language in articles.
- The Unreferenced articles August 2026 backlog drive is underway. Help to add references to 47,000 articles.
- The Articles for creation August 2026 backlog drive is under way. Help to review 4,500+ drafts.
Happy Adminship Anniversary, DatGuy!
[edit]Happy Adminship Anniversary to you! Happy Adminship Anniversary to you! Happy Adminship Anniversary, @DatGuy! Happy Adminship Anniversary to you!
Hi,
I am wishing you a happy adminship anniversary!
Here's some adminship anniversary presents!
| The Admin T-Shirt | ||
| I give this to you for your contributions and as a adminship anniversary present! Cheers, (◕ᴗ◕✿) Zahrazamedahmedi (🗨️Wanna Talk To Me?🗨️) (🫗My Mistakes🫗) 01:29, 15 August 2026 (UTC) |
| The CheckUser Barnstar | ||
| I give this to you because you have blocked various sockpuppets and as a adminship anniversary present! Cheers, (◕ᴗ◕✿) Zahrazamedahmedi (🗨️Wanna Talk To Me?🗨️) (🫗My Mistakes🫗) 01:29, 15 August 2026 (UTC) |
Happy Editing and have a good morning! Cheers, (◕ᴗ◕✿) Zahrazamedahmedi (🗨️Wanna Talk To Me?🗨️) (🫗My Mistakes🫗) 01:29, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
[edit]| Happy adminship anniversary! Hi DatGuy! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
[edit]| Wishing DatGuy a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! ☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 20:10, 15 August 2026 (UTC) |
Precious anniversary
[edit]| Nine years! |
|---|
Hello! I'm not really used to SPI as opposed to more informal CU requests at SRG or WPSPAM so apologies if I've done anything wrong. My understanding based on prior reports for this case is that there's some technical peculiarity which confirms that accounts are related, which M7, the locking steward, presumably didn't know about. Not having access to Giraffer's notes on checkuserwiki I had no way of informing M7 about it in my SRG report, which is why I felt it would be helpful to have an enwiki CU look at this as well. Would you consider reopening the case? lp0 on fire () 22:22, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong, the locks weren't even instituted until after your report. The stewards also have access to Giraffer's notes on cuwiki, as well as a crosswiki form of CheckUser (whereas naturally enwiki CUs are restricted to enwiki). As the behaviour is focused more on crosswiki spam rather than enwiki disruption, it belongs more on meta, and I trust the stewards do their own sleeper checks. Regardless, this case in particular is fairly unique and most of the accounts found are by behavioural rather than technical connection. DatGuyTalkContribs 22:38, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

