PALMDALE : Court Says City Broke Meetings Law
- Share via
A state Court of Appeal panel has ruled that Palmdale violated the state’s open meetings law by refusing to publicly disclose a city attorney’s memo to City Council members on a controversial development project.
The council had rebuffed requests to release the 1989 memo even though it had discussed the project--and the memo itself--at a public meeting.
Reversing a lower court ruling, the appellate court said Tuesday that the city could not claim the document was protected by attorney-client privilege after the council had discussed the issues in public.
Such a privilege would only apply to issues discussed in closed sessions, the court said.
The ruling is a victory for attorney Barbara Blinderman, who sued the city in June, 1989, on behalf of a Palmdale resident who opposed a land split approved by the city that year to permit an AM-PM Mini Market.
Plans for the project later lapsed and died during the lawsuit.
More From the Los Angeles Times
Podcasts
The latest effort is coming from the L.A. County Board of Supervisors. They just announced a $3 million program in conjunction with some nonprofits groups to test and clean the soil at homes still standing in the areas impacted by the Eaton Fire.
The Hillside Strangler murders terrorized Los Angeles in the late 1970s. The killers were a pair of sadistic cousins. One confessed. The other was set to stand trial—until L.A. prosecutors flinched.
Hosts Fidel Martínez and Suzy Exposito sit down with Dr. Vanessa J. Díaz, professor of Chicano and Latino Studies at Loyola Marymount University and co-author of P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance.
