-
Click here to listen to this article - Share via
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred
Galina Bobreneva was passing through Hollywood Burbank Airport last month with her husband when she was pulled aside by two federal agents. After 15 minutes of questioning, she was taken away in handcuffs to an unmarked vehicle. Bobreneva was arrested, accused of overstaying her visa and sent to a detention facility in the Mojave Desert for two weeks. She spent her 40th birthday there, in conditions she described as filthy and unsanitary. Her U.S. citizen husband, who voted for Trump three times, managed to secure her release (for now) but was stunned by her arrest.
Bobreneva entered the country legally from Russia. She has a pending green card application and no criminal record. That did not protect her from being caught up in the government’s latest front in its mass deportation drive: domestic U.S. airports.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has had a presence at many U.S. airports since March, when agents were sent in to help control lines during the government shutdown that halted pay for Transportation Security Administration agents. ICE agents making arrests at airports, however, is relatively new, the result of the TSA sharing travelers’ information with immigration authorities. So far, at least 27 foreign nationals have been arrested by ICE at airports across the country.
They are far from “the worst of the worst.” Those detained include a Fulbright scholar, newlyweds who just married U.S. citizens and an engineer awaiting his visa extension. One airport detainee was a woman with sickle cell anemia who uses a wheelchair; another was the recipient of a “Teacher of the Year” award.
These people are not criminals; they are folks with pending immigration cases. They are playing by the rules and going through the process of renewing visas, applying for asylum or adjusting their immigration status.
Perversely, because the government is prioritizing immigration enforcement, it is falling further behind in processing the paperwork that people need for legal status. The immigration backlog is estimated at 3.1 million cases, according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse researchers.
This amounts to a catch-22 situation. The government is making it harder for foreigners to adjust or update their immigration status — and then arresting them at airports when their visas or papers are out of date.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, said: “This administration is working diligently to ensure that aliens in our country illegally can no longer fly unless it is out of our country to self-deport.”
But there is no sound logic behind the new policy of airport arrests. The only reason ICE is now targeting travelers is that the government has set a goal of 2,000 immigration arrests a day. The move toward arresting travelers contradicts Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s pledge that, under his leadership, ICE operations would be low-profile and less aggressive.
ICE agents grabbing people at the airport is a disaster waiting to happen. Deadly shootings in Maine, Minnesota and Texas are proof that some immigration agents are prone to escalating volatile situations. Is that a threat that should be added to airports? Should fliers be forced to wonder when immigration agents will next open fire at bystanders? Who wants their children to witness a woman in handcuffs being dragged away by masked men? (This happened at Salt Lake City’s airport.)
There is danger for agents as well. Last month, ICE officers were attempting to arrest a man at the Las Vegas airport when they were surrounded by angry bystanders. As a confrontation ensued, the officers were forced to abandon their efforts, walking away and leaving their suspect behind. It was a chaotic scene that could have put the officers at risk of harm, especially at a time when Quinnipiac polling reports that 60% of American voters disapprove of how ICE is doing its job.
Immigration agents have broad authority to detain people they suspect of being in the country illegally. Yet instead of hunting down people in line for a green card, the government ought to focus on increasing the speed and efficiency of how immigration applications are processed. Too many foreign nationals are stuck in legal limbo as a result of immigration backlogs, leaving them vulnerable to detention or deportation.
The government should not be sending ICE agents into airports for immigration arrests. The potential for public harm far outweighs any benefit that might come from meeting an arbitrary quota.
Raul A. Reyes is an immigration attorney and television commentator in New York City. X: @RaulAReyes; Instagram: @raulareyes1
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
- The article argues that ICE’s new focus on arresting travelers at domestic airports is sweeping up people who entered the country legally and are actively trying to resolve their status, rather than violent criminals, echoing broader reporting that many airport detainees are professionals, students and spouses of U.S. citizens with no criminal records.[2][5][11]
- It contends that TSA’s sharing of passenger data with ICE has transformed routine airport travel into an immigration dragnet, making people with expired documents or pending applications “easy targets” as the administration pursues an internal goal of roughly 2,000 immigration arrests per day.[3][5][13]
- The piece maintains that this enforcement‑driven strategy deepens already serious immigration backlogs, leaving millions of foreign nationals in legal limbo and vulnerable to detention even though they are attempting to follow the rules—an assessment reinforced by reports that many airport arrestees were awaiting adjudication of their status.[9][10][11]
- It warns that conspicuous arrests inside terminals risk chaotic confrontations between agents and bystanders, noting recent episodes in which travelers and airport workers reacted angrily to ICE operations and national coverage described viral videos and rising safety concerns among airlines and employee groups.[1][4][11]
- Building on those safety worries, the column suggests that aggressive airport enforcement could escalate into dangerous use‑of‑force incidents in crowded public spaces, adding an unnecessary layer of fear to environments where fliers already face heightened security scrutiny.
- The article further argues that because immigration agents already possess broad legal authority to detain people deemed removable, resources should shift away from seizing travelers at gates and toward clearing case backlogs and processing applications more efficiently, using existing law while minimizing harm to families and communities.[8][10][11]
- Overall, the piece portrays airport arrests as a policy choice driven more by numerical enforcement targets than by public safety or fairness, and concludes that the potential for public harm far outweighs any benefit that might come from meeting an arbitrary quota.[5][13]
Different views on the topic
- Federal officials have defended the airport sweeps as a legitimate way to ensure that people in the country without authorization cannot use domestic air travel, stating that such travelers should only be able to fly when leaving the United States to “self‑deport.”[1][6][13]
- Administration representatives and allied commentators describe the shift as a corrective to what they portray as earlier leniency that allowed undocumented individuals and visa overstayers to board flights, framing the new policy as restoring the rule of law and reversing prior restrictions on airport enforcement.[7][9][10]
- ICE and DHS statements emphasize that coordination with TSA and access to passenger data enable agents to locate individuals with immigration violations more efficiently, presenting airports as an effective venue to execute existing removal orders and identify visa overstays without lengthy investigations.[2][5][12]
- Legal analyses highlight that immigration statutes, including provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, authorize ICE officers to arrest individuals with probable cause to believe they are removable even without a judicial warrant, and some commentary views airport operations as a lawful use of those powers so long as constitutional limits are observed.[8][11]
- Supporters of stricter enforcement argue that targeting visa overstays and unresolved immigration cases is essential to maintaining the integrity of the system, asserting that failure to act undermines fairness to migrants who comply with deadlines and may encourage additional overstays.[7][9][10]
- Officials and some legal experts also stress that the airport strategy focuses on people with documented immigration violations—such as overstayed visas or ignored deportation orders—rather than random travelers, and maintain that those arrested have been identified through existing government records rather than broad profiling.[2][10][12]
More From the Los Angeles Times
Podcasts
The latest effort is coming from the L.A. County Board of Supervisors. They just announced a $3 million program in conjunction with some nonprofits groups to test and clean the soil at homes still standing in the areas impacted by the Eaton Fire.
California once bet big on offshore wind to help power its clean-energy future, but the Trump administration is now paying developers billions to walk away from their projects. As California’s remaining offshore-wind leases hang in the balance, the state is fighting back in court.
The Hillside Strangler murders terrorized Los Angeles in the late 1970s. The killers were a pair of sadistic cousins. One confessed. The other was set to stand trial—until L.A. prosecutors flinched.
