-
Click here to listen to this article - Share via
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred
One of the main features of political life today is a complete lack of inhibition in saying what you think. Sometimes this disinhibition is just part of the smash-mouth, WWE-style culture that is omnipresent in traditional and newer social media platforms — crass but signifying very little. And sometimes it betrays deep currents of hate and prejudice.
In terms of the effects of uninhibited speech, it doesn’t really matter whether it rests on a sincere conviction or is all about the entertainment value. Such speech has a deeply corrosive effect not only on the targets of the speech but on society at large, which becomes more and more habituated to coarse and hateful expression. We all stand to lose by tolerating it.
Exhibit A for this trend is the recent Jewish American Summit last weekend in Los Angeles. The event was described as an opportunity for Jews to come together “to be inspired”: “Leave with renewed confidence, purpose, and optimism about the future of the Jewish community.” Its main sponsor was the Orthodox Jewish outreach group Aish L.A., which was joined by a long roster of well-known Jewish organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Federation of Greater L.A. and the Jewish National Fund.
Rather than a celebration of Jewish life, the summit turned into a platform for anti-Muslim hate. The person who sucked up all the energy in the room was Mosab Hassan Yousef, a Palestinian ex-militant who describes himself as a former Muslim. In his vulgar tirade, Yousef gave voice to deep contempt for Islam, the Quran, the prophet Muhammad and contemporary Muslims. In what seemed to be a desperate attempt to keep up with white nationalist extremists, he spit out such lines as “I don’t want Muslims in America,” “this country is better without your belief system” and “you disgust me.”
Significant responsibility rests with the organizers who gave this individual a platform at the event. It is never a good look to bring in former members of a group to validate your distaste for the group itself. This tactic calls to mind the Jewish apostates who played the role of Inquisitorial witnesses or censors of Hebrew books in centuries past. And that’s what happened at the Jewish American Summit. Yousef’s remarks were red meat to the lions in the crowd who enthusiastically applauded his anti-Muslim insults. Was he performing his shtick? Or expressing his deep-felt hate?
It didn’t matter, because he was reinforcing dangerous stereotypes about Muslims that have become rooted in American, and American Jewish, political culture. Hateful rhetoric matters. It informed the anti-Muslim event organized several weeks earlier by far-right activist Jake Lang in Dearborn, Mich., under the banner “the Christian Crusader March” in which he demonstratively ripped up a Quran at a City Council meeting. It informed the teenage killers who attacked the mosque in San Diego in May, killing three people and leaving behind a white supremacist manifesto. And it informs the messages of people in power who repeat “replacement theory” rhetoric, such as Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) and President Trump.
Sadly but not surprisingly, this kind of performative hate is not only visited on Muslims. It is also visited on Jews by a mix of extremists from across the political spectrum who all too readily tap into long-standing conspiracy theories about Jewish global domination. Given the resurgence of hate in the United States, this is a moment that demands moral clarity and courage.
It is necessary to take a stand against the haters, many of whom regard Muslims and Jews — sometimes independently and sometimes together — as inferior to white Christians. Political leaders from left, center and right, tech entrepreneurs, educators, and activists should come together to reverse the culture of disinhibition. A good first step would be for all of the sponsors of the Jewish American Summit, beginning with Aish L.A., to condemn without equivocation Yousef’s remarks. This is all the more essential in an age when Islamophobia is growing in our country and finds safe quarters in the heartlands of the American political establishment, from Texas to Washington.
At the same time, we must all join together — Jews, Christians, Muslims and others — to condemn the disturbing currents of antisemitism in this country. But we must do so by honing our powers of discernment to distinguish between hatred of Jews and serious political critique of Israel, lest we succumb to a weaponization of the label “antisemitism” that neither makes Jews safer nor opens the door to honest and constructive dialogue.
Finally, we need to build up horizontal alliances between groups with shared interests. No longer should or can we rely on the state to be our protector. Nor are we most effective when we fight only on behalf of our own community. Working together, as the two of us, a Jew and a Muslim, have been doing for years, is the best way to imagine and bring into existence a more perfect union for all.
David N. Myers is a professor of Jewish history at UCLA. Salam Al-Marayati is president and co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council.
More to Read
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
- The article argues that contemporary political culture encourages uninhibited, often coarse speech, and that this disinhibition has shifted from mere spectacle to rhetoric that normalizes hate and prejudice against vulnerable groups, including Muslims and Jews.[3][4]
- It contends that the recent Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles, promoted as a unifying and inspiring gathering for the Jewish community, instead became a stage for overt anti-Muslim invective, undermining its stated purpose of communal renewal.[1][2]
- The piece describes Mosab Hassan Yousef’s appearance at the summit as a “vulgar tirade” against Islam and Muslims, emphasizing that whether the performance was sincere or theatrical, the impact was the same: reinforcing dangerous stereotypes and feeding broader currents of Islamophobia in American and American Jewish political culture.[1][4]
- It argues that organizers and sponsoring institutions bear significant responsibility for platforming a former member of a targeted group to validate hostility toward that group, noting that such tactics echo historical episodes in which apostates were used to legitimize persecution.[3][4]
- The article links the summit rhetoric to a wider ecosystem of performative hate, citing events such as a Quran-tearing demonstration in Dearborn and a deadly attack on a mosque in San Diego as examples of how inflammatory speech helps legitimize harassment and violence against Muslims.[1][4]
- It further asserts that similar patterns of prejudice are directed at Jews, as extremists across the political spectrum invoke conspiracy theories about Jewish power and global domination, situating antisemitism and Islamophobia as interconnected threats within U.S. public life.[3][4]
- The piece calls for moral clarity and courage from political leaders across ideological lines, as well as from tech companies, educators and activists, urging a collective effort to counter the culture of disinhibition that allows bigotry to flourish.[3][4]
- It insists that sponsors of the Jewish American Summit, beginning with Aish L.A., should unequivocally condemn the anti-Muslim remarks delivered at their event, mirroring demands from Muslim civil rights advocates who have publicly called for apologies and explicit rejection of Islamophobia.[1]
- At the same time, the article urges Jews, Christians, Muslims and others to jointly oppose rising antisemitism, while carefully distinguishing between hatred of Jews and legitimate political criticism of Israel, warning that overusing or weaponizing the term “antisemitism” can hinder both Jewish safety and honest dialogue.[4]
- Finally, it advocates building horizontal alliances among communities rather than relying solely on the state for protection, arguing that sustained Jewish–Muslim cooperation and broader interfaith partnerships offer the most promising path toward a more inclusive and resilient democracy.[3][4]
Different views on the topic
- In contrast, some Jewish political organizations and commentators dispute the characterization of the Jewish American Summit as an “anti-Muslim extremist” gathering, portraying such labels by Muslim advocacy groups as politically motivated and asserting that criticism of Islam or Muslim political actors can be a legitimate part of public debate rather than evidence of bigotry.[2]
- The Republican Jewish Coalition, for example, has described being blacklisted by certain Muslim civil rights organizations as a “badge of honor,” suggesting that those organizations themselves promote antisemitic or anti-Israel positions and framing denunciations of summit speakers as attempts to delegitimize conservative Jewish political advocacy.[2]
- Additionally, strands of scholarship and commentary emphasize that antisemitism is a historically unique prejudice with distinct theological, racial and political dimensions, arguing that equating it too closely with Islamophobia risks obscuring its specific features and the particular ways it has operated in Europe and North America.[4]
- Some scholars therefore caution against treating antisemitism and Islamophobia as fully parallel phenomena, maintaining that while both are serious forms of hatred, they may require different analytic frameworks and policy responses, and that conflation can blur necessary distinctions between criticism of religious ideas, political movements and racist targeting of communities.[4]
- There are also voices that view accusations of Islamophobia against summit speakers and sponsors as efforts to stifle forthright discussions about extremism within Muslim communities, contending that strong criticism of radical Islamist ideologies or certain Muslim political figures should not automatically be equated with prejudice against Muslims as a whole.[2][4]
More From the Los Angeles Times
Podcasts
In this episode, we bring you the update on how an Altadena resident and her neighborhood are coming along, plus a re-run of the two-part series we did on the Poppyfields people back in June.
California once bet big on offshore wind to help power its clean-energy future, but the Trump administration is now paying developers billions to walk away from their projects. As California’s remaining offshore-wind leases hang in the balance, the state is fighting back in court.
The Hillside Strangler murders terrorized Los Angeles in the late 1970s. The killers were a pair of sadistic cousins. One confessed. The other was set to stand trial—until L.A. prosecutors flinched.
