Tap to enable a layout that focuses on the article.
Advertisement

Trump administration revives rollbacks of species protections from first term

A monarch butterfly feeds on milkweed
A monarch butterfly feeds on milkweed in Chicago in July.
(Erin Hooley / Associated Press)
0:00 0:00

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

  • Trump administration eliminates automatic protections for newly threatened species, requiring lengthy species-specific reviews that could delay saving monarch butterflies and manatees.
  • Environmentalists call the changes “absurd and heartbreaking,” warning species like the California spotted owl and North American wolverine face years-long protection delays.
  • The Interior Department will now weigh economic impacts when designating critical habitat, answering longtime Republican and industry calls to limit the Endangered Species Act.

President Trump’s administration moved Wednesday to roll back protections for imperiled species and the places they live, reviving a suite of changes to Endangered Species Act regulations during the Republican’s first term that were blocked under former Democratic President Joe Biden.

The changes include the elimination of the Fish and Wildlife Service’s “blanket rule” that automatically protects animals and plants newly classified as threatened. Government agencies instead would have to craft species-specific rules for protections, a potentially lengthy process.

Environmentalists warned the changes could cause years-long delays in efforts to save species such as the monarch butterfly, Florida manatee, California spotted owl and North American wolverine.

Advertisement

“We would have to wait until these poor animals are almost extinct before we can start protecting them. That’s absurd and heartbreaking,” said Stephanie Kurose with the Center for Biological Diversity.

The proposals come as extinctions have accelerated globally because of habitat loss and other pressures. Prior proposals during Trump’s second term would revise the definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act and potentially bypass species protections for logging projects in national forests and on public lands.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement that the administration was restoring the Endangered Species Act to its original intent while respecting “the livelihoods of Americans who depend on our land and resources.”

Advertisement

The changes answer long-standing calls for revisions to the 1973 Endangered Species Act from Republicans in Congress and industries including oil and gas, mining and agriculture. Those critics argue the law has been wielded too broadly, to the detriment of economic growth.

Another change proposed Wednesday tasks officials with weighing potential economic impacts when deciding what habitat is crucial to the survival of a species.

“These revisions end years of legal confusion and regulatory overreach, delivering certainty to states, tribes, landowners and businesses while ensuring conservation efforts remain grounded in sound science and common sense,” Burgum said in a statement.

The Interior Department was sued over the blanket protection rule in March, by the Property and Environment Research Center and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. The two groups argued the rule was illegal and discouraged states and landowners from assisting in species recovery efforts.

PERC Vice President Jonathan Wood said Wednesday’s proposal was a “necessary course correction” from the Biden administration’s actions.

“This reform acknowledges the blanket rule’s unlawfulness and puts recovery back at the heart of the Endangered Species Act,” Wood said.

Advertisement

Brown writes for the Associated Press.

Sign up for Essential California

The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.

Advertisement
Advertisement