-
Click here to listen to this article - Share via
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred
Immigration and Customs Enforcement held a hiring fair last month in Provo, Utah, that drew hundreds of job seekers — in part with signing bonuses up to $50,000 and salaries of $50,000 to $100,000 a year. This follows recruiting events in Arlington, Texas, in August and Chantilly, Va., in June. Despite polls showing that most Americans do not like how the agency is doing its job, these expos were quite popular. “This is a highly desired career,” an ICE official told reporters at the Texas event. “A lot of people want to do this job.”
That seems to be true, which makes recent changes in ICE’s hiring and recruiting practices all the more troubling. Flush with cash from Congress, the agency is ramping up hiring while lowering standards for employment. ICE is using controversial slogans and imagery to attract new recruits. In its rush to expand, ICE is placing immigrants, citizens and its own agents in harm’s way.
Under the terms of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that the president signed into law in July, Congress has given ICE an additional $75 billion in funding. The agency wants to hire at least 10,000 new agents as the administration seeks to fulfill its promise of deporting a million immigrants a year.
To meet this goal, ICE is lowering hiring standards. ICE agents can now be as young as 18, and there is no longer an age cap for new hires. The agency has also cut training time for recruits from 13 to eight weeks, by reducing Spanish lessons, firearms training and classroom hours. Working for ICE does not require a high school diploma, a military background or any law enforcement experience. An aspiring ICE agent only has to pass a background check, meet physical and medical requirements, and complete the abbreviated training course.
In contrast, many local police and sheriff’s departments have stricter hiring requirements. The Los Angeles Police Department requires its applicants to have a high school diploma, to complete six months of training and to be 21 at the time of police academy graduation.
ICE’s lower standards are alarming, given that agents have the power to make decisions with life-altering consequences. A teenager who formerly worked in a retail store or office workers bored with their daily routine could soon be out on the streets of L.A., carrying a gun and chasing anyone they think might be a migrant. New ICE agents might be placed in volatile situations without enough experience or judgment to make sound decisions. Immigrants — or anyone who looks like one — may be at risk of rookie ICE hires violating their constitutional and civil rights.
Unfortunately, we have been here before. Between 2006 and 2009, the Border Patrol scaled up quickly too. Hiring and training requirements were eased, with some agents rushed into training before background checks were completed. This resulted in drug cartel members being hired, corruption and a spike in agents being arrested for misconduct. With its ongoing rapid expansion, ICE is poised to repeat the same kind of mistakes.
ICE’s recruitment campaign is likewise problematic. “America has been invaded by criminals and predators. We need YOU to get them out,” is one such appeal, which plays on false notions of “invasion” and immigrant criminality. On its official X account, Homeland Security uses images of Uncle Sam, as though joining ICE were akin to a military mobilization. In one post, the agency asks, “Want to deport illegals with your absolute boys?” In another, it asks, “Which way, American man?” This meme appears to reference, “Which Way Western Man?” — a 1978 book by an avowed white supremacist.
ICE slogans urge job seekers to “Defend Your Country” and “Protect the Homeland.” But such language smacks of propaganda, not professionalism. Former ICE officials are rightfully concerned that such tactics might draw the wrong kind of recruits. Rather than attracting qualified applicants who want to serve in federal law enforcement, ICE may be appealing to people with antipathy toward immigrants, or who see themselves as helping defend the U.S. from demographic changes.
ICE performs a vital function for the government, with agents shouldering great personal risk and responsibility. Yet ICE’s current practices are far from ideal, with well-documented instances of agents using excessive force and engaging in physical and verbal abuse of suspected undocumented immigrants. So this is not the time for ICE to lower standards. The agency’s latest hiring and recruiting efforts will not bolster the agency’s image or effectiveness. Instead they raise serious questions about new agents’ readiness, ability and suitability for this line of work. To put it simply, do we really want teenagers participating in ICE raids?
To remedy the situation, ICE should slow down and properly train incoming agents. The minimum age should be reinstated to 21. More thorough Spanish-language instruction should be restored to curriculums. Otherwise, fast-tracked employees will be sent unprepared into communities that are already angry and fearful, which is potentially dangerous for everyone involved.
ICE’s hiring spree is reckless and irresponsible. As a matter of public safety, immigration enforcement should not be an entry-level job.
Raul A. Reyes is an immigration attorney and contributor to NBC Latino and CNN Opinion. X: @RaulAReyes; Instagram: @raulareyes1
More to Read
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
The author argues that ICE’s rapid hiring expansion under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act represents a dangerous lowering of employment standards, with the agency now accepting applicants as young as 18 without requiring a high school diploma, military background, or law enforcement experience[2]. Furthermore, the author contends that ICE has shortened training programs from 13 weeks to just eight weeks by eliminating crucial components like Spanish-language instruction and firearms training, creating potentially hazardous situations where inexperienced agents make life-altering decisions[2].
The author expresses significant concern about ICE’s recruitment campaign, arguing that slogans like “America has been invaded by criminals and predators” and references that appear to link to white supremacist literature could attract applicants with inappropriate motivations rather than qualified law enforcement professionals[2]. Additionally, the author warns that this approach mirrors historical mistakes, pointing to the 2006-2009 Border Patrol expansion that resulted in corruption and misconduct when hiring standards were similarly relaxed[2].
The author advocates for immediate reforms to address these concerns, recommending that ICE reinstate a minimum age requirement of 21, restore comprehensive training programs including thorough Spanish-language instruction, and slow down the hiring process to ensure proper vetting and preparation of new agents[2]. The author concludes that immigration enforcement should not function as an entry-level position given the serious responsibilities and potential consequences involved[2].
Different views on the topic
Supporters of ICE’s expansion efforts point to the significant demand for these positions, with the agency receiving 100,000 job applications following the allocation of $8 billion in funding to triple its workforce through hiring 10,000 new officers and agents[1]. This surge in applications, along with similar increases at CBP which saw 50,000 applications representing a 40% increase from 2024, suggests substantial public interest in immigration enforcement careers[1].
Proponents argue that the substantial funding and rapid expansion are necessary to meet the administration’s enforcement goals, including conducting 3,000 arrests per day and achieving one million deportations within the first year[1]. Business communities and employers are actively preparing for this increased enforcement through enhanced compliance measures, suggesting industry acceptance of expanded ICE operations[3][5]. Legal experts advise companies to conduct internal audits, develop response plans, and train workforce personnel to handle ICE interactions, indicating recognition of the legitimacy and permanence of these enforcement efforts[3][5].
Advocates for current hiring practices note that while training has been streamlined, the agency still maintains background checks, physical and medical requirements, and completion of training courses for all new hires[2]. Some observers suggest that concerns about recruitment imagery may be overblown, with design experts arguing that certain controversial elements could be attributed to “typographic ignorance” rather than intentional messaging, and that militaristic themes might simply reflect attempts to convey strength and authority rather than problematic ideological positioning[4].