Trump warns he’s considering limited strikes as Iranian diplomat says proposed deal is imminent
-
Click here to listen to this article - Share via
- President Trump warns limited military strikes against Iran are possible, even as nuclear negotiations continue between the two countries.
- Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran expects to finalize a draft deal within two to three days for Washington’s review.
- Both countries have signaled they are prepared for war if talks over Iran’s nuclear program fail to produce an agreement.
WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Friday that limited strikes against Iran are possible even as the country’s top diplomat said Tehran expects to have a proposed deal ready in the next few days after nuclear talks with the United States.
In response to a reporter’s question on whether the U.S. could take limited military action as the countries negotiate, Trump said, “I guess I can say I am considering that.” A few hours later, he told reporters that Iran “better negotiate a fair deal.”
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a TV interview earlier that his country was planning to finalize a draft deal in “the next two to three days” to send to Washington.
“I don’t think it takes long, perhaps, in a matter of a week or so, we can start real, serious negotiations on the text and come to a conclusion,” Araghchi said on MSNOW’s “Morning Joe” show.
The tensions between the longtime adversaries have ramped up as the Trump administration pushes for concessions from Iran and has built up the largest U.S. military presence in the Middle East in decades, with more warships and aircraft on the way. Both countries have signaled that they are prepared for war if talks on Tehran’s nuclear program fizzle out.
“We are prepared for diplomacy, and we are prepared for negotiation as much as we are prepared for war,” Araghchi said Friday.
Ali Vaez, an Iran expert at the International Crisis Group, said Iran “would treat any kinetic action as an existential threat.”
Vaez said he didn’t think Iran’s leaders were bluffing when they said they would retaliate, and they probably believed they could maintain their hold on power despite any U.S. airstrikes.
Trump said a day earlier that he believed 10 to 15 days was “enough time” for Iran to reach a deal after recent rounds of indirect negotiations, including this week in Geneva, that made little visible progress. But the talks have been deadlocked for years after Trump’s decision in 2018 to unilaterally withdraw the U.S. from Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. Since then, Iran has refused to discuss wider U.S. and Israeli demands that it scale back its missile program and sever ties to armed groups.
Araghchi also said Friday that his American counterparts had not asked for zero enrichment of uranium as part of the latest round of talks, which is not what U.S. officials have said publicly.
“What we are now talking about is how to make sure that Iran’s nuclear program, including enrichment, is peaceful and will remain peaceful forever,” he said.
He added that in return, Iran would implement some confidence-building measures in exchange for relief on economic sanctions.
In response to Araghchi’s claim, a White House official said Trump had been clear that Iran could not have nuclear weapons or the capacity to build them and that it could not enrich uranium. The official wasn’t authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Tehran has long insisted that any negotiations should focus only on its nuclear program and that it hasn’t been enriching uranium since U.S. and Israeli strikes last June on Iranian nuclear sites. Trump said at the time that the strikes had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear sites, but the exact level of damage is unknown as Tehran has barred international inspectors.
Iran has also insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful. The U.S. and others suspect it is aimed at eventually developing weapons.
Trump’s comments have faced pushback from some lawmakers who say the president should get Congress’ approval before any strike.
Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia said Friday that he had filed a war powers resolution that would require that step. Though it has no chance of becoming law — in part because Trump would have to sign it — some bipartisan consensus has arisen recently among senators who forced votes on previous resolutions on military action in Venezuela.
None of those resolutions passed, but they were successful in showing how lawmakers are troubled by some of Trump’s aggressive foreign policy maneuvers.
“If some of my colleagues support war, then they should have the guts to vote for the war, and to be held accountable by their constituents, rather than hiding under their desks,” Kaine said in a statement.
Amiri and Kim write for the Associated Press. Amiri reported from New York. AP writers Michelle L. Price, Ben Finley and Stephen Groves in Washington and Jon Gambrell in Dubai contributed to this report.